No because it is an ORDER and an ORDER must be carried out. The protective order is set in place to protect you and the accused.
Do not respond. It could be a trick. If you don't have an order against them, they can technically contact you. But if you respond to them, you will violate the order. If their contact persists, you can get a protective order against them for harassment.
If the husband has an order of protection from his wife, it applies everywhere. If a person has a protective order restraining another person from contacting them, and would then like to have contact with that person, the person who obtained the order should go back to the court and ask the court to dismiss the original protective order.
If a person has a restraining or protective order prohibiting the from making contact with a specific individual, all contact is prohibited, including social media.
I am not a lawyer, but it really depends on the person who has the protective order in place. Essentially, nothing will happen unless the person with the order files a complaint or contacts law enforcement which could result in the husband being arrested for violation of the order.
A contact order is an order requiring the person with whom a child lives,to allow the child to visit or stay with the person named in the order or for that person and the child otherwise to have contact with each other.Childrens Act 1989, s.8.
It is a court order preventing one person from having contact with another.
i have a pertction order on someone and i want to know if i can contact him?
no. why would you even want to contact a person you gave a restraining order to? ain't that the whole point of RESTRAINING ORDER!?!?!
its a court order offering protection to certain classes of person who are not eligible to petition for a protective order.
you are not supposed to contact them either.
Yes but you have to have a very good reason for the orderAdded: The courts take a VERY dim view of requests for "tit-for-tat" court orders.
There is not order against the plaintiff.. the plaintiff is the person who filed the order, he or she is not in violation of an order that they placed. Only the defendant can be in violation as the courts have ordered that person to have no contact with the plaintiff not vice versa.Another View: The Plaintiff MAY, in fact, be in violation of the court's order. If the respondant was ordered to maintain a certain distance from the plaintiff, or stay away from the plaintiff's residence and place of work, or was ordered not to have any contact with the plaintiff,. . . AND THEN. . . the plaintiff wilfully violates the same order they petitioned for, the court can find them in violation of the order and they are in contempt of court.