It depends on the nature of the verbal evidence. You should contact an attorney who can review your situation and explain your rights and options.
It depends on the nature of the verbal evidence. You should contact an attorney who can review your situation and explain your rights and options.
It depends on the nature of the verbal evidence. You should contact an attorney who can review your situation and explain your rights and options.
It depends on the nature of the verbal evidence. You should contact an attorney who can review your situation and explain your rights and options.
Yes, swindling can be considered estafa, because swindling is committed by a person who defrauds another by means of cheating or stealing. Estafa on the other hand is committed by a person who defrauds another by means of unfaithfulness or abuse of confidence. therefore Swindling and estafa is committed by means of "deceit".
Yes, a person can file estafa in the context of a personal loan agreement if they can demonstrate that the borrower had no intention of repaying the loan and committed fraud during the agreement. Estafa typically involves deceitful practices that lead to financial loss. However, the specifics can vary by jurisdiction, and the person must provide sufficient evidence of the fraudulent intent and actions. It's advisable to consult a legal expert for guidance based on the particular circumstances.
Swindling. Estafa is committed by a person who defrauds another causing him to suffer damage, by means of unfaithfulness or abuse of confidence, or of false pretense opt fraudulent acts. For the existence of the crime of estafa, two elements are indispensable: fraud and damage. In other words, the essential elements of estafa are: (1) The deceit employed to defraud another; and (2) the injury or damage caused thereby.
w can i file swindling case to the person who not paying his loan money
All citizens are protected from unlawful detention by habeas corpus. Habeas corpus states that if there is no evidence against a person that officers can not arrest them.
The District AttorneyÕs office can press charges against a person if they have enough evidence of a crime. A person can press charges against a person if they have been violated in a legal sense.
Word against word, or testimonial evidence, can be considered in court but is generally weaker than other types of evidence such as physical evidence or documents. It can be challenging to determine credibility and reliability in a situation where it is one person's word against another. Additional evidence or corroboration may be necessary to support a case based solely on testimonial evidence.
Estafa in Philippine law is a crime involving deceit or fraud where a person causes damage to another by using false pretenses, fraudulent means, or intentionally misleading behavior. It is punishable under the Revised Penal Code of the Philippines.
When a person faces an estafa case, they may encounter serious legal repercussions, including criminal charges, fines, and potential imprisonment if convicted. The individual could also suffer damage to their reputation and may find it challenging to secure employment or engage in business activities in the future. Additionally, they may be required to make restitution to victims, further complicating their financial situation. Overall, an estafa case can have long-lasting effects on both personal and professional aspects of a person's life.
Jury
The Exclusionary Rule's purpose is to keep certain evidence from being used against you in a criminal trial. Police procedure in gathering evidence against you is heavily dictated by cases interpreting the Fourth Amendment. Evidence gathered in violation of your Constitutional rights is subject to the Exclusionary Rule.
only if there is evidence that support a probable cause against you.