Yes, the administrator of an estate may purchase a home from the estate; however, that type of transaction is inherently a conflict of interest and would have to be approved by all beneficiaries having an interest in the property or by the probate court. Obviously a person buying a house wants to pay as little as possible to buy a house; but, the administrator has a fiduciary duty to receive as much as possible when selling the house. Usually, the administrator gets the consent of all beneficiaries to the transaction. They agree in advance that the sale price is satisfactory and that they have no objection to the administrator buying the house at that price. Sometimes administrators are required to apply to the probate court for the authority to sell the house and for permission to buy it. The administrator would have to prove to the court that the transaction is fair and above board. The beneficiaries would have an opportunity to raise objections if they object to the purchase price. If the administrator has no ownership interest in the property, he cannot force the beneficiaries to sell the house to him/her.
It depends on the specific laws and regulations of the region where the estate is being settled. In some cases, executor fees can be included in the settlement statement without prior approval of beneficiaries if the terms were agreed upon in the will or approved by the court. It is generally advisable for the executor to communicate and obtain consent from beneficiaries to avoid potential disputes.
The possessive form for the noun beneficiary is beneficiary's.
As long as the court agrees, yes they can. The beneficiaries cannot prevent the estate from being settled.
The executor distributes the money to the beneficiaries after the estate's debts have been settled to the satisfaction of the court. Each beneficiary is responsible for what they do with the money. There is no requirement, and it would be detrimental, for the executor to play bookkeeper and accountant and pay of the debts of the beneficiaries of the estate.
There wouldn't normally be liens on the inheritance...but on the assets in the estate, which can't be distributed and become an inheritance until they are settled by the estate.
This case can specifically be settled by the family
Montana was settled in 1803 because of the Louisiana Purchase
When there are co-executors of an estate one has no superior rights over the other. If they cannot agree then the conflict needs to be presented to the court for a solution. The beneficiaries have the right to expect that the estate be settled with expediency. An executor who is holding up the process can be removed by a petition filed by the heirs or the other executor.
Inheritance funding companies are very similar to places like Cash America and payday loans. They front you the cash on your inheritance before it is settled. Inheritance Funding Company is the name of one of the companies. Read more at http://www.inheritancefunding.com/inheritance-advance-inheritance-loans/.
Depending on the jurisdiction, the executors might be liable. I would urge legal advice.
An inheritance is paid as soon as the estate has been settled. If you inherited as a minor and the money was put in trust for you, you can claim it at age eighteen.
It is possible to settle an estate without selling property. As long as the distribution is approved by the court, the property can be transferred to the beneficiaries.