In New Zealand, what you talk of is "plea-bargaining" and does not mean the criminal is not sentenced or that the case is dismissed, but it does mean the criminal or prosecution will get lesser of a sentence eg less money to pay, or less of a sentence in jail.
It depends on whether it was dismissed with prejudice or without prejudice. If with prejudice, it can never be reinstated. If without prejudice, it can reinstated at any time. Usually a court will dismiss without prejudice.
If a case is dismissed means the Judge threw the case out of court. If a juror is dismissed, the juror is told to go home and another juror replaces him. The disposition is the final outcome. That is when the judge is through with the case. If it is a civil case, one side either has to pay the other side or not. If it is a criminal case, one person goes to jail or walks free. Anyway, everyone leaves the court room.
Without Prejudice means the petitioner is free to file another action based on different circumstances. I'll bet they still call you.
If the judge dismissed it with prejudice, it doesn't necessarily mean that you "won." All that disposition means is that the JUDGE didn't believe the case against you was grounded in law.Whether the case was civil or criminal, the EXACT same charge could not be brought against you again at the level of original jurisdiction, however, if the Plaintiff (or Prosecutors Office) appealed the judge's decision to the appelate level, the appelate court could conceivably overrule the original judge's dismissal which would have the effect of re-activating the case. If the appelate court refused to hear the appeal, or it affirmed the judge's decision THEN the case would truly 'go away.'
It means that the judge dismissed your charges. The prosecution will dismiss the charges when they cannot proceed in good faith or they cannot prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt at trial. Usually because there was a problem with a piece of evidence or the availability of a witness. Sometimes cases are dismissed during plea negotiations when a person will plead to one case in exchange for the dismissal of another. Sometimes the evidence unfolds and there is doubt that the person charged is really the one that committed the crime. Be carefeul, just because the judge dismissed your case doesn't mean they can't re-file charges against you, but that rarely happens.Added; Judges DISMISS charges - Prosecutors NOLLE PROSEQUI charges.
(in India) Matters are generally dismissed on two grounds. Dismissal of matter after considering the merits of the matter. Another type of dismissal is dismissal for want of prosecution of matter on the part of the Plaintiff. If, the matter is dismissed on merits, the course left open is to prefer an appeal, if provided under the scheme of the procedural statute. If, the matter is dismissed for want of prosecution and not on merits, such matter can be restored to file under the provisions of procedural law. For further research and study, please refer to the Indian Code of Civil Procedure, 1809The proper use of word should "restoration" and not "reinstated" as used in the question.ANOTHER VIEW: (in the US) Criminal charges can be dismissed by a judge in one of two ways.Dismissal WITH Prejudice and Dismissal WITHOUT Prejudice.If a case is dismissed WITH prejudice it means that the defendant cannot ever be re-charged with that same offense again.Dismissal WITHOUT prejudice means that the defendant MAY (at the option of the prosecution) be re-charged again for the same offense.In the first example, the defendant is "home free."But in the second example it cannot be certain that they won't be re-charged, because that option IS available to the prosecutor.
The trial can be repeated without it being considered double jeopardy when a verdict was not reached unless it was dismissed with prejudiced. They reason is that you are not considered to have been tried if a verdict was not able to be reached. Sometimes a case can be dismissed with prejudice and another trial is not allowed. This can happen if they determine that they was not enough evidence to even go to the jury
A person can prejudice another person but not be a racist by always being positive and tolerant.
No, not without refiling another "13".
Hi, another word for discrimination can be harassment or perjudices.
Prejudice, discrimination, judging?
summons or subpoena, yes