Yes, they can as long as the federal law is not contradicted or if it is intended to preempt all state legislation in that area. For example, the federal government establishes a minimum wage, but states are free to establish higher ones if they wish. A higher minimum wage does not conflict with the federal law, because the purpose of the federal law is to help workers and a state minimum wage helps workers even more. Thus, it does not conflict with the intent of the federal law.
It is already regulated by state and federal government.
The Federal government does not regulate traffic offenses. These are regulated by the states. The Federal rules deal with specific types of transportation, usually with insuring the free flow of traffic across state boundries.
The insurance industry has some federal regulations, but the federal govenment cedes most control to the state insurance commissions, each state has one and they regulate a companies and agents in that state and all companies and agents who do business in that state. These commissions are who you would report it to if you suspected a company of illegal actions.
The public school education system is regulated by?ælocal school boards and by state governments. In certain cases, the federal government can step in.?æ?æ
False
yes
regulated federalism
Organized farmers would get state and Federal Laws passed that would regulate the railroads.
immigration!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(in the US) Yes, they are, though by state, not federal, law.
This will be different from state to state; it is not regulated at the federal level.
regulate