Yes. Assuming the case was voluntarily dismissed by the DA for lack of evidence, the DA can re-file those same charges at a later date if he obtains additional evidence. Unless the crime is particularly severe or in the public eye in some way, however, it is unlikely many resources will be devoted to obtaining additional evidence.
Also, most crimes in common law jurisdictions have a statute of limitations which requires, in essence, that prosecution be instituted within a certain time. So, again, unless the crime is severe or violent, it will have a relatively brief (2-10 years usually) period in which a person can be prosecuted for it.
Thus while a DA can re-file on charges he voluntarily dismissed, he usually has a limited window in which to do so, and limited resources with which to accomplish it. Absent an external motivating factor like the severity or violent nature of the crime, any public outcry, or personal animosity, a DA re-filing charges would not be very likely to occur.
If the case is closed by the court it can never be opened again.
If it is voluntarily dismissed by the prosecutor or the police department, the plantiff in the case CAN bring the case back to court at another time (if the second case is dismissed, you're in the clear after that.) If it was involunarily dismissed by the judge, then no.
If you went to court and it was dismissed, it's about as clear as it's going to get. If anyone is questioning that go back to court and ask for a "letter of disposition" on this charge.
It can have several meanings depending on the context and the phraseology of the sentence in which it is contained. Give the fully worded example please. "Dismissed with Prejudice" means the case is dismissed, forever.It can't be brought back to court. A case dismissed without prejudice means the opposite. It's not dismissed forever.If the case was dismissed without prejudice, a plaintiff could resurrect it, if, for instance, there was some new evidence. But, "with prejudice" means the court is closing the case permanently.
When a case is dismissed with prejudice, it means that the case is permanently closed and cannot be brought back to court. On the other hand, when a case is dismissed without prejudice, it means that the case can be refiled in the future.
When a case is dismissed with prejudice, it means that the case is permanently closed and cannot be brought back to court. On the other hand, when a case is dismissed without prejudice, it means that the case can potentially be refiled in the future.
If he is not paying court ordered child support, he is contempt of court. All you need to do is, go to the court which issued the order and address the issue.
Yes, if the case was dismissed "without prejudice."
The defendant is the person charged with the offence who is seated at the back of the court room until needed for giving evidence.
If the defendant fails to appear in a civil court lawsuit, the plaintiff can motion the court for what is known as a default judgement. In laymen terms, they win. If the defendant shows up but the plaintiff did not, they can motion to have the case dismissed with prejudice. This means that the person who sued them cannot bring the same matter back to the courts again.
The statute of limitations on a case dismissed without prejudice should be the same as the statute of limitations for the charges. Being dismissed without prejudice just means either the plaintiff or the state has dropped the case for now, but still have the right to bring it back. For example, if they dismiss a murder case without prejudice, there's no statute of limitations. They can bring it back at any time. For personal injury, the length varies by state. It could be anywhere between 1-6 years where they could bring the case back. Check the charge number for your state. You could probably Google "statute of limitations (state) (charge)". Many states list their statutes online. Hope this helps
It goes back to the original court after a motion for a new trial has been filed and granted.