As the question is put, the answer is likely no.
The tenant has a right to peaceful enjoyment of the property.
If the tenant was in violation putting the flower pots out, that is different.
The courteous thing would be to give a warning.
If the tenant had been warned, then they were wrong to not remove them and should not complain about consequences following their inaction.
None, its their house
Legally, a life tenant is someone who has rights to the house only during their lifetime. A life tenant cannot leave the house to anyone by will because they do not have complete rights to the house.
If the tenant has a rental agreement with the owner, the tenant is responsible.
Generally, in the US - No.
The property may go into foreclosure, but that has nothing to do with the tenant. Until there is a foreclosue sale, the tenant is obligated to pay rent to the owner.
The opposite of tenant (non-owner resident) could be "owner." The opposite status is "landlord."
"Absence of the owner" is a telling part of your question. The association has the responsibility to protect the community. It is reasonable that the association wants proof of an owner's background check and more for a tenant, for example. Your 'house guest' may be treated like a tenant, reasonably, if occupancy appears to be that of a tenant, and your 'house guest' is not a close relative (whose occupancy may be covered in your governing documents) You may challenge this review. Primarily, however, you, too, have an obligation to participate in the safety and security of the community.
The home owner of course. Tenants have tenant´s rights such as 30 day notice before eviction etc., but the home owner owns it.
Most likely not: if you're paying rent on a house you could live there forever and still not own the house. I lived in a house for 17 1/2 years as a tenant before I moved out: I don't own it. He has the right to become the owner if the true owner agrees to put the house up for sell. But then again there is no point. You would be safer as a homeowner rather than renting the house, because if the owner all of the sudden wants the house for something then they might kick you out and you will have no where else to go. And yes renting is probably cheaper than owning the house but you will have no worries of something like that happening.
A snake in a house, whether it bites a tenant or the owner, affects only the person who resides in that home. In the context of Vastu, the auspiciousness or inauspiciousness of the home impacts its inhabitants. This means that both the tenant and the owner can be indirectly affected. For example, if a tenant is in a Vastu-compliant home, they may experience better opportunities in their business or profession and are more likely to pay rent promptly to the owner. In this case, both the tenant and the owner benefit from the positive Vastu of the home. However, if there are negative Vastu effects, it primarily affects the tenant, and the owner may also be indirectly impacted, especially if the tenant faces difficulties. Just like an electrical defect in the house gives a shock to the tenant, Vastu effects apply directly to the tenant and partially to the owner in terms of rent and other financial matters. It's advisable to seek Vastu guidance before moving into a rented home, as many individuals do to ensure a harmonious living environment. Aura Vaastu Consultancy Suddip Mehta : Best Vastu Consultant, Vaastu Expert
The owner can sell a house under a lease, but the buyer must either honor the terms of the lease or make an offer to get the tenant to break the lease.
It is very difficult to prove if the tenant had not informed the tenant at the time of fall. Judge will suspect that it is fraudulent insurance claim. Tenants are not covered by a homeowner insurance. However, if the homeowner has a landlord insurance, tenants are covered.