Yes, a court can exist without a judge in certain contexts, such as in a jury trial where the jury plays a crucial role in determining the outcome. Additionally, some alternative dispute resolution processes, like arbitration or mediation, can function without traditional judges. However, in formal legal systems, a judge is typically essential for overseeing proceedings, ensuring the law is applied correctly, and maintaining order in the courtroom.
No such thing... If the question is, "What is a court trial?" the answer could be a trial by judge, without a jury, where the judge is both the trier of fact and renders judgment.
No, not without the order of a federal court judge.
no
No they can't, they must have a court order from a judge first.
When parties in a legal dispute agree between themselves to a settlement without going before a judge or without waiting for a trial to be concluded, they have settled out of court.
The judge is the voice of the court; his judgment is the court's judgment.
If the judge is revoking his own court order, it would make no difference whether your lawyer was present or not. The judge is allowed to revoke, withdraw, or alter, his own orders as he sees fit.
"OR" stands for "Own Recognizance". IOW, you are guaranteeing you will be in court on the date in which you are supposed to be (without having to post bail) and is determined by the judge/court.
No such thing... If the question is, "What is a court trial?" the answer could be a trial by judge, without a jury, where the judge is both the trier of fact and renders judgment.
The judge presides over the court and passes judgment, just like a judge in any other court does.
Are you looking for the phrase, "A FINDING?"
America's Court with Judge Ross - 2010 A Room Without a View Bake Off 1-95 was released on: USA: 19 January 2011