If you made a deposit on land and the sale didn't go through then you could sue the recipient of the deposit if you can prove you paid it and that it was paid as a deposit on the land. That may be difficult if there was no agreement in writing.
DNA proof , but if there is verbal contract that he will not be a part of the child's life then that contract is honored.
You have no legal recourse if there was not a written contract. Verbal contract are not enforceable unless it was said in front of a camera and witnessed by others.
A verbal contract is legal and binding. Although it is your word against theirs. You can sue which will cost you money but not necessarily get the reults you want. Suggestion: Find a new horse.
It depends on what the contract says. If you have a verbal contract, it's not worth the paper it's written on.
If someone performs a service, then they should get paid. One way of collecting money for services is to stipulate it prior the service. The contract can be verbal or written, however , a written contract is always better.
If you signed an agreement or contract saying so then yes. If he is just holding your car for money's sake then that is unlawful.
Someone can claim another person owes them money without a verbal agreement, but it would be very hard for them to prove it in a court or any other place. The person should learn from their unfortunate mistake and learn to write it down in front of witness' ( preferably someone that can notarize the paper), record the procedure with a camcorder or voice recorder, or even better- do not loan anyone money.
If it's from a car lot - they will give you papers to sign. When you sign it becomes a contract. Buying from a regular person - you give them some money and they give you the car keys.
Sorry. No. You're learning a hard fact of life. Verbal "contracts" are not legally enforceable. The old saying is very true; "A verbal contract is worth the paper it is printed on."
An enforceable contract requires the existence of the following elements: an offer, an acceptance that mirrors the terms of the offer, consideration, and lawful subject matter. The "consideration" can consist of money, property, a promise--just about anything of value that is not unlawful. Generally, a court will not inquire into the adequacy of the consideration. "Consideration" might be thought of as the "this for that" or the "quid pro quo". Even of the other elements are present, a contract cannot be enforced if the object of it is unlawful. That is, one cannot, for example, enforce a contract to rob a bank.
Morally, you should. Though, it depends if there was a verbal or otherwise contract, i.e. an agreement of a loan for you to pay him back. If there was, you are legally obligated to pay back the money to him.
Money laundering is the unlawful exchange of unlawfully gained money for lawful money by use of the change of ownership title or form. Capital flight is the lawful movement of funds from one jurisdiction for the purpose of improved investment opportunities, better business environments, and/or more beneficial costs and taxation rates. The first is unlawful, and the second is legitimate and wise. It is lawful to avoid taxation, but unlawful to evade taxation. It is lawful to move money to a better jurisdiction, but it is unlawful to transfer funds from one form or owner to another to hide unlawful sources.