It depends on what you call threats. And, it is unclear what you mean by your question. If he threatens to inform the court about an environment that is not healthy for the child, that is his right. If he threatens to harm her or her property due to the adversarial situation, that's is illegal and he could be sanctioned. The court would not view that kind of behavior to be in the best interest of the child. As for threats of harm:
The mother should try to document the threats and bering them to the attention of the court. She should be represented by an attorney who specializes in custody issues. At the hearing for custody, she should be prepared to detail the threats calmly, describe them clearly and testify only to the facts with no embellishments.
It depends on what you call threats. And, it is unclear what you mean by your question. If he threatens to inform the court about an environment that is not healthy for the child, that is his right. If he threatens to harm her or her property due to the adversarial situation, that's is illegal and he could be sanctioned. The court would not view that kind of behavior to be in the best interest of the child. As for threats of harm:
The mother should try to document the threats and bering them to the attention of the court. She should be represented by an attorney who specializes in custody issues. At the hearing for custody, she should be prepared to detail the threats calmly, describe them clearly and testify only to the facts with no embellishments.
It depends on what you call threats. And, it is unclear what you mean by your question. If he threatens to inform the court about an environment that is not healthy for the child, that is his right. If he threatens to harm her or her property due to the adversarial situation, that's is illegal and he could be sanctioned. The court would not view that kind of behavior to be in the best interest of the child. As for threats of harm:
The mother should try to document the threats and bering them to the attention of the court. She should be represented by an attorney who specializes in custody issues. At the hearing for custody, she should be prepared to detail the threats calmly, describe them clearly and testify only to the facts with no embellishments.
It depends on what you call threats. And, it is unclear what you mean by your question. If he threatens to inform the court about an environment that is not healthy for the child, that is his right. If he threatens to harm her or her property due to the adversarial situation, that's is illegal and he could be sanctioned. The court would not view that kind of behavior to be in the best interest of the child. As for threats of harm:
The mother should try to document the threats and bering them to the attention of the court. She should be represented by an attorney who specializes in custody issues. At the hearing for custody, she should be prepared to detail the threats calmly, describe them clearly and testify only to the facts with no embellishments.
the biological father is next of kin
No. If your mother has sole legal custody she can consent to your getting married.
see links
No. If your father has custody you cannot make that decision until you reach eighteen unless your father consents to a change in the custody order.No. If your father has custody you cannot make that decision until you reach eighteen unless your father consents to a change in the custody order.No. If your father has custody you cannot make that decision until you reach eighteen unless your father consents to a change in the custody order.No. If your father has custody you cannot make that decision until you reach eighteen unless your father consents to a change in the custody order.
If the father has legal custody, no. Not without his consent. If she has joint legal custody, no. Not without his consent. If she has sole legal custody, yes.If the father has legal custody, no. Not without his consent. If she has joint legal custody, no. Not without his consent. If she has sole legal custody, yes.If the father has legal custody, no. Not without his consent. If she has joint legal custody, no. Not without his consent. If she has sole legal custody, yes.If the father has legal custody, no. Not without his consent. If she has joint legal custody, no. Not without his consent. If she has sole legal custody, yes.
It will depend on many factors. Consult a lawyer. If you are worried the judge will move the child from you and give full custody to the father only based on him getting remarried, that is not how it works.
If you have sole custody no. However, can you still provide for the child? School etc? If she wants to prevent it then let her go to court.
you need to have proof of this. testmomials, documents, people to testify
see your other question
Did custody change?
Yes, but the father can still file an injunction to prevent it.
Most often the mother. JK Rowlin got custody there than took the children to England to keep the father from getting access rights.