This question makes very, very little sense. There is such a thing as the doctrine of lis alibi pendens, and some states have rules of civil procedure akin to South Carolina's Rule 12(b)(8). But your question is written so poorly that it is difficult to know what you are asking.
The magnitude of the resultant force in the case of the concurrent forces in equilibrium.
things that do not run back to back
Concurrent jurisdiction
Concurrent jurisdiction is when more than one court has jurisdiction over a case. These means that they have jurisdiction over the same case at the same time.
things that do not run back to back
Concurrent session (or sentence) means 2 different sessions (or sentences) that will run at the exact same time.
In the case of concurrent forces in equilibrium, the magnitude of the resultant force is zero. This means that the forces are balanced and cancel each other out, resulting in no net force acting on the object.
Concurrent forces are forces that act on a single point but have different lines of action. The resultant of concurrent forces is found by resolving the forces into components and adding them vectorially.
Concurrent jurisdiction
Either the state or federal court.
concurrent jurisdiction
Concurrent jurisdiction