While a judge MAY decide to allow the child to voice their desire, in the end it is the judge who will make the final decision based on what they believe are the long-term best interests of the child.
Tricky question. I would say it is technically a choice, because you are "choosing" to not make a choice.
The verb for making a choice is choose (chooses, choosing, chosen).
Choice is not in reality as best as it is schmick
The verb for making a choice is choose (chooses, choosing, chosen).
In such a situation, the courts may order the NCP to look for work and to report on her/his progress.
cruising choosing
Opportunity cost is the choice to do something but choosing that requires you not to something else.
Sheena Iyengar has written: 'The art of choosing' -- subject(s): Choice (Psychology), Decision making 'The art of choosing' -- subject(s): Choice (Psychology), Decision making
If they don't want to go to school, do you allow that choice? Shouldn't the child be allowed to choose what they want to do or not in all things, or do you only consider this when it comes to custodial interference? see links
option, vote, pick, choosing, alternative, substitute,
There is really nothing you can do their not minors their becoming adults in a year. They gave a choice who they could go with since their not minors
A minor in Washington is not allowed to choose the custodial parent until he is 18. Below the age of 18 a child can express their choice of a parent but the judge is not under any obligation to address the request nor allow it.