The rights of the English began with "Magna Carta" and the Common Law.
Social contract
The concept of natural rights forms the foundation of social contract theory by positing that individuals possess inherent rights that precede and exist independently of any government. These rights, such as life, liberty, and property, are surrendered to a government through a social contract to secure protection and order in society. The social contract serves to protect and uphold these natural rights, providing a framework for a just and orderly society.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau argued in his work "The Social Contract" that the people and their ruler enter into a social contract where individuals agree to be governed in exchange for protection of their natural rights. This contract defines the rights and powers of both parties and emphasizes the idea of popular sovereignty.
The social contract theory proposes that individuals consent to be governed in exchange for protection of their rights and well-being. The purpose of government, according to the social contract, is to maintain order, protect individual rights, and promote the common good of society. Governments derive their legitimacy from the consent of the governed, as outlined in the social contract.
create a state with just enough power to serve them.
Through the natural right
King George broke the social contract with the colonists by neither respecting nor protecting their rights. John Locke, the philosopher, was influential in developing the concept of a social contract.
natural rights social contract
John Locke believes that inalienable rights in a social contract belong to the people. People need government but the government needs to do what is best for the people.
Locke's social contract states that individuals give their country permission, either voluntarily or involuntarily, to assume some of their rights, and the individuals submit to the authority of the government, in exchange for protection of their remaining rights and freedoms. This theory relates directly to what Paine says in Common Sense, in that the colonies have participated in the social contract by forfeiting their righs to the English Crown, but the Crown has not upheld its end of the bargain and has not secured or protected their remaining rights.
Social contract usually assumes the existence of natural law which in turn defines some rights of individuals, and that individuals can trade off some of these rights under "social contract" for the protection that government can provide.Some philosophers say that there are no natural laws, and that what are assumed to be natural laws are no more than what is commonly agreed to be just laws. Without natural laws, there are no natural rights and there is therefore nothing for the individual to trade over to the government. On this view, the social contract theory can not be supported.It is also said that the social contract theory establishes the authority of government except when it is really needed. If the right of a government is established because I agreed, or entered into a social contract, to hand over my right to act as I please, then all I need do is cancel that contract before carrying out any crime I choose.
The social contract is no longer valid.