They have not. They are stringently regulated, but not banned.
There is no reason or necessity to ban firearms.
The Geneva Conventions do not specifically ban heavy weapons like .50 caliber firearms; however, they aim to protect civilians and limit the means of warfare. The use of heavy weapons can be restricted under international humanitarian law if they cause excessive civilian harm or suffering. Specific treaties, such as the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons, may address particular types of weapons and their usage. Ultimately, the legality of using such weapons depends on the context and manner in which they are employed in conflict.
The organization is called the ICBL. In addition, there is also an international diplomatic treaty that bans landmines: the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, known informally as the Mine Ban Treaty or the Ottawa Convention.
people in japan first started making them because of the ban of firearms
You are asking for an opinion. In my opinion, it is not reasonable. Countries that have implemented a firearms ban have found a corresponding increase in violent crime. Once a criminal is certain that their victim will not be able to defend themselves, they become more blatant in their actions. I would also point out that criminal acts took place prior to the creation of firearms. A ban on firearms is an attempt to regulate he behavior of people by regulating things. People commit arson, but we do not attempt to ban matches, lighters, or flint-and-steel.
The question should probably read, "What is THE mine ban Convention" as that is a popular name for the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, also known as the "Ottawa Convention". The Convention seeks to end existing suffering and to prevent future suffering. It bans the use, stockpiling, production and transfer of anti-personnel mines. In addition, states that accede to the Convention accept that they will destroy both stockpiled and emplaced anti-personnel mines and assist the victims of mines. In its long form, the mine ban convention is: The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction and it is the cornerstone of the international effort to end the suffering and casualties caused by anti-personnel (AP) mines. The Convention was adopted on 18 September 1997 and it entered into force on 1 March 1999. As of 1 September 2008, 156 states had joined. The States Parties to the Convention meet once a year, (once in Geneva, then in a mine-affected country) and have a Review Conference or Summit every five years (only two have taken place: Nairobi and Cartagena). Here's the link to the Convention's site: http://www.apminebanconvention.org/
yes . and hate the idea of it . just my opinion .
The Geneva Conventions do not specifically ban hollow point bullets; however, they do prohibit the use of weapons that cause unnecessary suffering or have indiscriminate effects. Hollow points, designed to expand upon impact and cause greater damage, may be viewed as causing unnecessary suffering in certain contexts. Consequently, their use can be controversial and is often restricted by various national and international laws, but they are not outright banned by the Geneva Conventions themselves.
The question should probably read, "What is THE mine ban Convention" as that is a popular name for the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, also known as the "Ottawa Convention". The Convention seeks to end existing suffering and to prevent future suffering. It bans the use, stockpiling, production and transfer of anti-personnel mines. In addition, states that accede to the Convention accept that they will destroy both stockpiled and emplaced anti-personnel mines and assist the victims of mines. In its long form, the mine ban convention is: The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction and it is the cornerstone of the international effort to end the suffering and casualties caused by anti-personnel (AP) mines. The Convention was adopted on 18 September 1997 and it entered into force on 1 March 1999. As of 1 September 2008, 156 states had joined. The States Parties to the Convention meet once a year, (once in Geneva, then in a mine-affected country) and have a Review Conference or Summit every five years (only two have taken place: Nairobi and Cartagena). Here's the link to the Convention's site: http://www.apminebanconvention.org/
The Constitutional Convention said that congress could not ban slave trade until 1808.
Refer to RCW 28B.30.150.The regents of Washington State University, in addition to other duties prescribed by law, shall:(1) Have full control of the university and its property of various kinds, except as otherwise provided by law.Yes, they can ban firearms from the apartments.