Slavery is not mentioned specifically in the Constitution but is implied in Section 3, Clause 1 where it defines how representation is to be determined (by population.) People fell into four catagories: free persons, free persons of indentured servitude for a period of years, Indians not taxed, and three-fifths of all other persons. "The three-fifths of a person" was how the slavery issue was dealt with, because slaves were people *and* property and could not be totally counted as "persons". However, to count them as persons could affect a state's representation in the House, so, to protect the property aspects of slavery for the South, whose support was absolutely essential for ratification, the "three-fifths compromise" was promulgated and accepted.
There were many people that opposed slavery. For this reason it was necessary to include a section that banned slavery for the passing of the US Constitution to go through..
The US constitution refers to slavery in Article I, Section 2, named the Enumeration Clause, where representatives are alotted. The 13th Amendment outlawed slavery in 1865 when it was passed by the Senate.
How important was the issue of slavery in the Constitution?
Slavery was abolished by an amendment to the Bill of Rights section of the US Constitution. The 13th Amendment abolished slavery in the United States.
Yes. The Articles of Confederation do not mention slavery in any way. This absence does not mean slavery was forbidden; rather, since there was no express ban of slavery under the Articles, slavery was indeed permitted in the U.S. under these statutes. Similarly the original Constitution does not mention slavery. Rather, in Article I, section 2, clause c, slaves are indicated in the phrase "and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other persons." while in Article I, section 9, clause a, Congress is forbidden to an the slave trade until 1808 at the earliest. Similarly article IV, section 2, clause c, established the first fugitive slave ordinance under the new Constitution.
Southern proslavery arguments did not include the belief that slavery was mandated by the Constitution of the United States. Slavery had been a contentious issue between the North and South since the Constitutional Convention of 1787.
The original U.S. Constitution did not explicitly address the issue of slavery, but it did include provisions like the Three-Fifths Compromise that tacitly upheld the institution. The Constitution also allowed for the continuation of the slave trade for a certain period of time.
Slavery was banned by the Constitution in 1865 by the Thirteenth Amendment.
The Constitution's framers were uncomfortable with the practice of slavery. The word slavery or slaves doe not appear anywhere in the Constitution.
In the United States, slavery was brought to end by the emancipation proclamation of President Lincolon and Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution which ended slavery in the United States in 1865.
In Article I, Section 9, Clause 1 used the phrase "The migration and importation of such persons as any of the states now existing shall think proper to admit," to refer to the practice of slavery. So in one sense, it is argued that the Constitution has never mentioned the issue of slavery, per se, but everyone knew that that phrase meant "slavery" when the Constitution was adopted.
It was an oblique reference to slaves and slavery in the US.