No, federal law enforcement authorities do not need a conviction to initiate asset forfeiture proceedings. Asset forfeiture can occur based on the suspicion that property is connected to criminal activity, regardless of whether a conviction has been obtained. This process can happen through civil or criminal forfeiture, with civil forfeiture allowing the government to seize assets without a criminal charge against the owner. However, the property owner can contest the forfeiture in court.
One of the complaints about asset forfeiture is that law enforcement is too restrained in its ability to seize property.True or False
Failure of call money for share holder its calld"forfeiture of shares"
His poor management of the business caused the forfeiture of the building and all the merchandise to his creations.
Forefiture of shares issued at par:-Share capital A/c Dr.To share allotment A/cTo Share Call A/cTo share forfeiture A/c(Forfeiture of shares issued at par)
A "cc cafa forfeiture" usually refers to a civil forfeiture action brought under the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act (CAFRA). This type of forfeiture allows the government to seize assets believed to be connected to criminal activity, even if the individual may not have been charged with a crime. It is important to understand the legal process and seek legal advice if facing a situation involving civil forfeiture.
yes there are.
Gene L Dodaro has written: 'Asset forfeiture programs' -- subject(s): Forfeiture
Yes, a military retiree can lose their pension due to a court conviction, particularly if the conviction is related to misconduct that impacts their military service. Under certain circumstances, such as felony convictions for offenses involving moral turpitude or crimes related to their duties, military retirees may face pension forfeiture. The specific rules can vary based on the nature of the offense and applicable laws. It is advisable for retirees to consult legal counsel for guidance on their individual situation.
Attainder
When a lord opposed the king, the punishment was very often forfeiture, which meant that the lord's lands and titles were taken away from him.
H. A. Arnn has written: 'Possibilities of reverter and forfeiture' -- subject(s): Cases, Forfeiture, Future interests, Reversion
Yes, Richard Marcinko was able to receive his military pension after his conviction. Although he was convicted of felony charges in 1992, his military pension was not affected by his criminal record. Military pensions are generally protected from forfeiture unless the service member is convicted of specific offenses related to their military service. Marcinko continued to receive his pension following his release from prison.