a) Discuss whether or not Gerrit has committed any torts. You must e specific and support your answers. Yes, he has committed tort because he grabbed something that did not belong to him. b) If the mechanics had thrown Gerrit off the property, would ABC be guilty of assault and battery? Explain your answer. Yes, if the mechanics had thrown him off, ABC would be guilty of assault, just by throwing him off the property, they will be committing both assault and battery, even if he did not got hurt either physical or mentally
The concept of federal law taking precedence over state or local law is commonly called "federal supremacy." This principle is established by the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which asserts that federal laws and treaties made under its authority take precedence over conflicting state laws. This ensures a uniform legal framework across the nation, preventing states from enacting laws that contradict federal statutes.
The U.S. Constitution takes precedence over, in order of hierarchy, federal statutory law, a state constitution, state statutory law, a local ordinance, administrative rules and rulings, and common law. It is the "Law of the Land." It is worth knowing that the Constitution does not take precedence of the Articles of Confederation where the Treasury was created, therefor the Treasury (IRS) is not bound to the limits of the Constitution nor are its Treasury agents.
Yes, federal law can override a state constitution if there is a conflict between the two. Federal law, as established by the U.S. Constitution, is considered the supreme law of the land and takes precedence over state laws or constitutions.
Yes, in the sense that the Article VI, Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution holds the Constitution, federal law and US treaties take precedence over state laws when the two were in conflict.
Yes, a state law can be overridden by a federal law under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which establishes that federal law takes precedence over conflicting state laws.
Federal law takes precedence over state law.
It says that federal laws takes precedence over a state law. This is known as the supremacy clause.
No, federal law prevails over conflicting state regulations due to the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. State regulations that conflict with federal regulations are considered preempted and are generally not enforceable.
It would be impossible to ascribe an exact number to answer your question. All courts of general jurisdiction have the power of judicial review, but the final arbiter of federal law and the US Constitution is the US Supreme Court, and the final arbiter of state statutes and the state constitution is the state supreme court (or equivalent), unless the state statutes or constitution conflict with the US Constitution over issues that could be considered federal questions.
If a state law conflicts with a federal law, the federal law should be followed. This is because the U.S. Constitution establishes federal law as the supreme law of the land, and it takes precedence over state laws in case of a conflict.
federal laws take precedence over state laws. Why you all up in my grill? homey g dog yo!
When there is a conflict between federal and state laws, the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution dictates that federal law takes precedence over state law. However, it is best to consult with a legal expert to specifically determine how the federal law definition of mobile home may interact with a state law defining mobile home in a particular situation.