A juror, or jurors, who fail to follow the instruction of the judge when he read them the applicable law, and who insist on sustituting their own reasoning instead of that of the law.
No, there only needs to be a majority as decided by the number of seated jurors.
Judges can say whatever they want to say. Some of them will just talk about a person's sentence. Others will give more insight about the person.
The jury practice of ignoring or misapplying the law is often referred to as "jury nullification." This occurs when jurors choose to acquit a defendant despite evidence of guilt because they believe the law itself is unjust or improperly applied in that particular case. While jurors are expected to adhere strictly to the law as instructed by the judge, this practice reflects a significant deviation from traditional legal processes, allowing jurors to exercise moral judgment over strict legal adherence. Such decisions can challenge the authority of the law, highlighting tensions between legal standards and societal values.
Jurors don't "ACQUIT" people. Jurors can only find the Guilty or Not guilty.
Jury answers refer to the responses provided by jurors during a trial, particularly when they are asked questions by the judge or attorneys. These answers help determine the facts of the case and guide the jury's deliberation process. Jurors are expected to base their answers on the evidence presented in court and their own understanding of the law as instructed by the judge. The integrity of these answers is crucial for ensuring a fair trial and reaching a just verdict.
The process to convict a murderer is quite simple. You arrest him. You present the case to the grand jury to get an inditement. You then take the case to a trial jury where the lawyers present the facts of the case to the jurors. Then the lawyers present their interpretation of the facts to the jurors. Then the Judge reads the law to the Jurors. Then the Jurors deliberate and return with a verdict. If the jury finds the defendant guilty, the prisoner is convicted. Following that, the state will pay for 2 direct appeals and 5 collateral appeals plus a hearing for a pardon. In the process, a bunch of lawyers get rich on your tax dollar.
At the completion of the trial the judge will "instruct" the jury in applicable law in effect in that particular state. If the defense raises "heat of passion" as a defense, the judge will instruct the jury of the applicable law which they then MAY consider. What goes on in a jury room is secret and no one will ever know (unless the jurors speak afterward) just WHAT the jury considered.
Jury instructions are presented by the judge to the jury. The judge explains what the laws are that govern the case at hand. Jury instructions define the elements of the charged offense and define the burden of proof. Each attorney gives the judge a set of proposed jury instructions. The judge considers each instruction and then decides which ones properly state the law that applies to the case. She then makes her instruction to the jury. The jurors must accept and follow the law as instructed by the judge and use that instruction in their deliberations as they weigh testimony and evidence presented at the trial. Jury instructions are not evidence.
In Scots Law a jury consists of 15 people chosen from the electoral role by ballot.
Richard Law - judge - died in 1806.
Richard Law - judge - was born in 1733.