No, members of Congress also create laws. Most of the time their debates are about whether a law conforms to the requirements of the United States Constitution.
England does not have a congress building. An analogy between the two nation's governments is difficult as they are entirely different systems. England has The House of Commons and The House of Lords.
Because Congress passed laws saying how much should be witheld in taxes. Now as to WHY Congress did that, that is an entirely different matter....
It depends entirely on the country. The US, UK, France, and most countries have two houses of congress. Portugal, Turkey, and China have only one house of congress. There are also a few countries like Saudi Arabia that have no proper legislative branch at all.
No- not in the US. The speaker of the US house is a leading member of the lower house of Congress and is entirely independent of the President's cabinet.
In 1921 and 1924, Congress implemented immigration restrictions that targeted immigrants from Asia, effectively barring immigration from the entire region. The Immigration Act of 1924, also known as the Johnson-Reed Act, established quotas that severely limited the number of immigrants from countries outside Western Europe and excluded Asian immigrants altogether. This legislation reflected the nativist sentiments of the time and aimed to preserve the racial composition of the United States.
Well, it entirely depends on which regard you want to control it. if it is population, the government could introduce new legislation that discourages people to live in densely populated areas, or legislation that encourages people to move into high density housing and not join the trend of urban sprawl.
Not entirely, although in theory there is a way to only indirectly involve Congress. If three-fourths of the states, through their legislatures, petition Congress to create a convention to propose amendments, then Congress is required to do so. However, this doesn't guarantee that the convention will propose the specific amendment any given group would like to see.
No the treatment of animals depends entirely upon the strength of ad hoc pieces of legislation that are introduced from time to time.
This phrase advises caution and critical thinking in evaluating information. It suggests that appearances can be deceiving and rumors may not be entirely true, so it's important to not blindly trust everything you encounter.
I'm not entirely sure, but what I've heard is that a bill has passed through the state legislation that would change the driving age from 16 to 18 by January of next year.
Sorry, but your question is too general/can be read too many different ways. Are you asking (1) what ratios to use if you are evaluating whether or not to invest in a bank, (2) what ratios do banks use when evaluating whether or not make a commercial loan, (3) what ratios do banks use when evaluting consumer loan applications, or (4) something entirely different. Please repost a more specific question.
In 1912, America was still entirely capitalist. "Healthcare" (which usually refers to state-run health insurance) would have been laughed out of congress in 1912.