The applicability of a law is dependent upon an underlying set of facts and circumstances.
When you apply a law to a set of facts, you effectively interpret it to be applicable, and if it is applicable to a set of facts and circumstances that haven't been previously tested, then I suppose you're making law -- but it is the same law, just applied to a new set of facts.
The big difference of opinion is not whether a law should be made or interpreted as such, but rather what the law is. There is a spectrum of opinion and judges of those courts (appellate courts) that review how laws are applied to facts, have differing opinions.
The spectrum ranges from those who believe that if the law does not contain the words specifically applicable to a situation, it should not be applied -- these are the "strict" constructionists.
At the "other end" of the spectrum are judges who believe that while there may be no new laws as such, the sources and scope of our body of laws are broader.
Either way, judges "make law" by interpreting it as applicable or inapplicable, or if applicable, how it will apply.
That is a personal call only you can make.
If federal judges are elected, there can be less partisanship - if they are appointed, the politician appointing them will likely choose judges who agree with them politically.
"Do you agree" is correct. "Are you agree" is wrong (you'd have to say "are you in agreement").
I would agree that the answer is probably yes.
It is called a per curiam opinion. The judges remain anonymous because a majority if not all of the judges agree on the ruling and not one single judge/minority is writing the opinion.
once and all Judges must agree
That the Judges can save a person who has the lowest number of votes. They can only do this one time and the next week two people will go. All four judges must agree to save someone
I agree.
When making a credit card purchase at a store, you agree to pay the credit card company that issued the card.
MMA, Mixed Martial Arts is a full-contact sport in which the body is struck by an opponent with intent to inflict injury. A unanimous decision is when all the judges agree together the winner of the MMA contest.
Agree is already a verb because it is an action.Other verbs are agrees, agreeing and agreed.Some example sentences are:"We agree with you"."She agrees to meet him"."I am agreeing with the boss"."We all agreed to have chocolate ice cream instead of vanilla today".
1