for sure GIVE HIM A PIECE OF YOU! if your spouse wanna be like that you sue his sorry BUT back too the court room but this it wont be the marrige certifacate. You can do anything where more smart, useful, kind, caring, loving ect. the point is dont let your spouse do that kinda thang! SUE HIM ALREADY! That goes for HER too
No. Alienation of Affection as legal grounds for a lawsuit was abolished in Louisiana in 1927.
Alienation of affection is a suit against your spouse's lover saying that this person broke up your marriage by attracting your spouse away from it. Most states have abolished this claim completely, and in those where it is still valid, it is very difficult to win.
If you're talking about an ALIENATION OF AFFECTION lawsuit, most states have abolished that law.
An alienation of affection lawsuit is one in which a spouse can sue a third party if his or her partner leaves the relationship for another person.To win, an alienation of affection lawsuit needs to prove that:Love between the married spouses must have existed.The marital love must have been alienated and destroyed.The third party's conduct has to be proved to be malicious interference with the marriage relationship.Most states in the United States have abolished this type of lawsuit as it is considered to be archaic and an unacceptable form of revenge.Historically, the alienation of affection law was based on the belief that a wife was the property of her husband. Therefore, when a woman was emotionally or sexually involved with another man, she was considered to have been stolen.Those who want the alienation of affection laws to remain believe that alienation of affection lawsuits protect traditional marriage. Also Known As:Criminal ConversationHeart Balm TortsRevengeSpousal TheftExamples: As of January 2008, the only states in the United States that allow alienation of affection lawsuits are: Hawaii, Illinois, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah.Alabama: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Alaska: Neither state law nor case law addresses the issue of alienation of affection in Alaska.Arizona: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Arkansas: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.California: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Colorado: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Connecticut: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Delaware: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.District of Columbia: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Florida: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Georgia: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Hawaii: Yes, alienation of affection lawsuits can still be brought.Idaho: No, alienation of affection lawsuits were abolished through judicial decision.Illinois: Yes, alienation of affection lawsuits can still be brought.Indiana: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Iowa: No, alienation of affection lawsuits were abolished through judicial decision.Kansas:No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Kentucky: No, alienation of affection lawsuits were abolished through judicial decision.Louisiana: In 1927, in the case of Moulin v. Monteleone, 165 La. 169, 115 So. 447, actions for alienation of affection were abolished.Maine: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Maryland: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Massachusetts: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Michigan: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Minnesota: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Mississippi: Yes, alienation of affection lawsuits can still be brought.Missouri: No, on June 17, 2003, Missouri's highest court abolished the state's alienation of affection law.Montana: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Nebraska: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Nevada: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.New Hampshire: No. According to Title XLIII, Chapter 460:2, "No damages shall be allowed to either spouse in any action based on alienation of the affections of the other spouse."New Jersey: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.New Mexico: Yes, alienation of affection lawsuits can still be brought.New York: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.North Carolina: Yes, alienation of affection lawsuits can still be brought.North Dakota: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Ohio: No, in 1985, alienation of affection suits were abolished by General Laws c. 207, Sect. 47B, inserted by St. 1985, c. 74 Sect. 1.Oklahoma: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Oregon: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Pennsylvania: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Rhode Island: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.South Carolina: No, alienation of affection lawsuits were abolished through judicial decision.South Dakota: Yes, alienation of affection lawsuits can still be brought.Tennessee: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Texas: No, in 1997, Family Code, Chapter 1.107 was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Utah: Yes, alienation of affection lawsuits can still be brought.Vermont: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Virginia:No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Washington: No, alienation of affection lawsuits were abolished through judicial decision.West Virginia: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Wisconsin: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Wyoming: No, legislation was enacted to abolish the right to bring an alienation of affection lawsuit.Source: About.Com
Alienation of affection is a civil lawsuit typically addressed under state law, not military law. It involves a claim made by one spouse against a third party for interference in the marital relationship. While military personnel can be involved in such cases, the lawsuit itself is governed by civilian legal standards rather than military regulations. Thus, it is not specifically a lawsuit under military law.
No. Texas Family Code 1.107: "A right of action by one spouse against a third party for alienation of affection is not authorized in this state."
The state of Texas no longer recognizes alienation of affection as a reason for a lawsuit. However, you may be able to sue her for something else or under a different jurisdiction depending on the circumstances. To find out about your specific situation, check with an attorney.
No. Only a few states still recognize alienation of affection. An alienation of affection lawsuit is where a spouse sues their spouse's mistress/lover, claiming that the "other man/woman" destroyed the marriage. These are also sometimes called home wrecker lawsuits. Even in the few states that still allow such a claim, a victory is rare.
United StatesMost states have abolished alienation of affection lawsuits. The laws that allowed that type of suit came from a time when a woman was considered the property of her husband and he could recover damages if another man interfered with his property. Such suits are currently allowed in only seven states: Mississippi, Utah, Hawaii, Illinois, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota.If you wish to bring a lawsuit against a person you think is interfering with your marriage, you should seek advice from an attorney who specializes in divorce and marriage law in your jurisdiction. However, the legal fees may be costly and the culprit (the person who owes a duty of loyalty and fidelity to you) will still be living in your home. Your problem will not be solved.See link for more information:In_what_states_can_Alienation_of_Affection_lawsuits_still_be_filed
In California, you cannot sue your spouse for cheating in a divorce, as the state does not recognize adultery as a legal ground for divorce. However, you may have grounds for a lawsuit under "alienation of affection" if a third party is involved, but this is not commonly pursued and can be complex. Ultimately, issues of infidelity are typically addressed within the divorce proceedings rather than through separate legal action.
Years ago it was possible in any US state to sue the person who interfered in a marriage causing harm to the innocent family members for "alienation of affection". Although a very small number of US states still have such laws in existence, winning a lawsuit based on those grounds is simply not possible. Even if by some miracle the court agreed to hear such a case and the plaintiff prevailed it would be a simple matter to have the ruling overturned at the appellate level. The allegation can still be used relating to the dissolution of a marriage, but as grounds for a damage suit the legal community views such as De Minimus Non Curat Lex, (The law does not concern itself with trifles.).
There may be grounds for a lawsuit but generally, no. You should consult with an attorney who can review the details and explain your rights and options.There may be grounds for a lawsuit but generally, no. You should consult with an attorney who can review the details and explain your rights and options.There may be grounds for a lawsuit but generally, no. You should consult with an attorney who can review the details and explain your rights and options.There may be grounds for a lawsuit but generally, no. You should consult with an attorney who can review the details and explain your rights and options.