0
Do you need to answer the plaintiffs questions in a civil suit if the only evidence that could prove their case lies in your answer?
In a civil suit, you may be required to answer the plaintiff's questions during discovery, especially if the information is relevant to the case. However, you have the right to assert certain privileges, such as attorney-client privilege or the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination, if applicable. Failing to respond could lead to negative consequences, including court sanctions. It's advisable to consult with legal counsel to navigate these situations effectively.
What else can I help you with?
How evidence could be gathered incorrectly?
Evidence could be gathered incorrectly when there is bias or lack of objectivity in the collection process, when there is mishandling or contamination of the evidence, or when proper chain of custody procedures are not followed, leading to questions about the integrity of the evidence. Additionally, if the evidence is not collected using appropriate methods or tools, it may not accurately represent the situation being investigated.
Can evidence I have be used by me in an arbitration if my opponents have not seen it before?
It would be up to the Arbitrator as to whether or not you could present it. Criminal Court "rules of evidence' do not apply in civil proceedings such as arbitration.
What two questions did the original constitution not clearly answer that were decided by the civil war?
The Constitution did not clearly answer whether slavery was legal or whether African-Americans could be citizens. These questions were answered in 1865, right after the Civil War, in the 13th and 14th Amendments, respectively.
Can you use criminal evidence in a civil court prior to criminal conviction?
Question is not quite clear. If the criminal trial is completed but not yet adjudicated or the defendant has not yet been sentenced, any evidence produced at the criminal trial COULD be ruled admissible at a civil trial. It may call for a ruling from the judge presiding at the civil trial in order to determine it admissibility.
What is an example of evidence a historian could use to support a claim about the American civil war?
The Emancipation Proclamation freed slaves only in states that had seceded from the union
What statement is an example of evidence a historian could use to support a claim about the American civil war?
The Emancipation Proclamation freed slaves only in states that had seceded from the union
Contemt of court?
Contempt of Court is issued when a person has been hiding evidence from the court that could have helped them to solve the crime or civil case. Their only issued if the person has been asked by the court if they have any evidence for them if the person who has been asked replies no but knows that he has evidence he will be issued a Contempt of Court.
What factors other than those examined in the lesson could have affected the outcome of civil war?
you are literally an idiot. stop putting all of your questions from the lesson on the internet
What does DBQ mean?
DBQ could mean multiple things:Daily Book QuizDocument Based Questions
I have a few questions about the Dynasty Doll Collection?
If you have a few questions about the Dynasty Doll collection, you could ask those questions here. You could also ask a collector to answer your questions or you could check with a dealer.
What are the facts about amendment 5?
The Fifth Amendment can be asserted in any proceeding, civil or criminal, administrative or judicial, investigatory or adjudicatory; and it protects against any disclosures which the witness reasonably believes could be used in a criminal prosecution or could lead to other evidence that might be so used
What protections does the Fifth Amendment provide in civil cases?
The Fifth Amendment protects individuals in civil cases by ensuring they cannot be compelled to testify against themselves, also known as the right against self-incrimination. This means that individuals have the right to remain silent and not provide evidence that could be used against them in a civil proceeding.
