Yes, in court, a police officer must provide evidence to prove that you were speeding, such as radar readings or eyewitness testimony.
not really, they will write you a ticket and if you do not agree you can go to court.
No police Officer has the power to make you pay a ticket before the court date. I happen to be a police Officer. When a Police Officer writes you a traffic citation he will give you a Court date that you are suppose to attend to prove your innocence. If you choose not to attend court you have the option to pay the fine. Paying the fine before your court date basically is saying that you are guilty. If the officer tells you to just pay the fine reason being is that he either has a weak case against you or he wont show up to court. Now for Example if you plea not guilty in court the Judge will give you another court date to attend in which the officer will be given a subpoena to testify against you. If the Officer does not show up in court the case will be dismissed.
Yes. Just be able to prove where you were at the time written on the ticket. Can you PROVE beyond a shadow of a doubt that you were somewhere else at the time/date on the ticket?
You should contact the police immediately. Have your court orders available to prove you have custody and the police will advise you on your next step.You should contact the police immediately. Have your court orders available to prove you have custody and the police will advise you on your next step.You should contact the police immediately. Have your court orders available to prove you have custody and the police will advise you on your next step.You should contact the police immediately. Have your court orders available to prove you have custody and the police will advise you on your next step.
If the speed was not locked in and the officer refused to show you the radar, take the ticket to court. Odds are in your favor that the judge will dismiss your ticket. That answer is incorrect. In no state is there a requirement that the officer show you the radar or even that he lock it in. The officer's testimony is sufficient for a conviction. In fact, in most states all an officer has to testify is that he visually observed you speeding and that is sufficient.
it depends on how long after the fact if it was given in the same time frame and does he have you on tape i would take it to court he has to prove to the court that he saw you do it and you have to prove you were in the right. most of the time the cop dont show up on a lot of cases but good luck. il is weird on the laws
No. The speed of a vehicle at the time of braking can be estimated by measuring skid marks, but the absence of skid marks doesn't mean the vehicle wasn't moving. Speed can be estimated by a number of other methods.
If you are pulled up for speeding by the police, not only would you be held up, but it will possibly prove expensive and risk losing your driving licence.
If you can clearly prove that there was no reason, the officer could, potentially, be punished. That being said, the chances of you proving the officer did so without reason is next-to-none.
yes, to prove law violation in a court of law.
by saying if the person is gulity or not gulity with prove of items or records
All they have to prove is that it was within manufacturer's specifications and calibrated properly, so when stopped by police, they don't need to show you the radar gun, when you ask to see it. An officer does not, and more than likely, will not show you what speed you were going on there radar. That issue would come up in court.