Yes--if the damages did not exist when the tenant moved in and exceed "normal wear-and-tear."
Speculatively speaking, it is likely that the following is true: If the water heater is provided by the LL then the landlrod is responsible for damages. If the water heater is owned by the tenant then the tenant is responsible for damages.
Both. And both will be fully responsible for paying the rent and any damages to the apartment. If the primary tenant fails to pay the co-signer will be held fully responsible for paying.Both. And both will be fully responsible for paying the rent and any damages to the apartment. If the primary tenant fails to pay the co-signer will be held fully responsible for paying.Both. And both will be fully responsible for paying the rent and any damages to the apartment. If the primary tenant fails to pay the co-signer will be held fully responsible for paying.Both. And both will be fully responsible for paying the rent and any damages to the apartment. If the primary tenant fails to pay the co-signer will be held fully responsible for paying.
If a landlord plans to make upgrades to a tenant's apartment, they will usually pay for the tenant to stay somewhere else, like a hotel. While the tenant is gone, their apartment will get new carpet, paint, or whatever else is needed to make it nicer.
Landlord can keep deposit and sue tenant's estate if damages to the apartment was done outside of normal wear and tear.
it is common courtesy to do so but they are not required by law
The Apt. comp. is responsible!!!!!
From an insurance perspective the landlord should have coverage on the building and the tenant should have coverage on his/her contents. Legal liability may be a different issue depending on the circumstances of the fire.
A person who rents an apartment is commonly referred to as a tenant or a renter.
If the tenant damages the property he is liable for such damages. The Landlord may or may not have his own insurance for this purpose but the tenant is liable. If the Tenant has his own insurance (Renter's Insurance) then the Tenant may file a claim and damages will be covered by that insurance.
The cast of Night Terrors - 2007 includes: Alan Charles Blackney as Man having dreams Rod Hollowell as Apartment tenant Eric Pirooz as Annoying neighbor Margie Robbins as Apartment tenant Lisa Shalet as Apartment tenant George Snarberg as Apartment tenant
In California that would be considered normal wear and tear, so the answer to your question would be NO.
That depends on if damage was present when the tenant moved in, the length the tenant resided there, the type and level of damage caused. If the tenant lived there 15 years and the carpet had been there 10 years before the tenant moved in, that would be reasonable wear and tear as the carpet is 25 years old.