It does not always support with republicanism. In a judiciary the president appoints the judges the people don't on the contrary republicanism is were the people elect representatives and vote them in congress. Now when the judicial branch wants to pass laws it would always have controversy with the representatives because they might have different ideas than the judicial court that would serve the common good of the people (representatives job). To conclude, the independent Judiciary some times will conflict with representatives.
Yes, India have a independent judiciary.
In the US, the independent judiciary is necessary.
The independent of judiciary is the concept that the judiciary needs to be kept away from the other branches of government. It is vital and independent to the idea of separation of powers.
It was important because it support the constitution
It has an independent judiciary.
It was important because it support the constitution
yes as india's salient feature is to be independent
Independent judiciary was a fledgling idea in Medieval Europe. ?æWith the establishment of Habeas Corpus and the Magna Carta, the foundation was established for courts to be a separate entity.
YES , division of powers and independent judiciary the two important features of federal form of government
both have an independent judiciary
It has a bicameral Legislature, an Independent Judiciary and a strong Executive.
yes