In theory yes, in practice it doesn't happen.
Which Queen? There are a lot of Queens. In the UK no bill can become law without royal assent so I'd say her veto power is pretty serious. However, the Queen rarely uses that veto power.
veto
full of veto
No. The President only has one choice to veto or to pass it. Once he veto's it goes back to congress where they can kill it or they can override his veto with 2-3 majority.
The Queen's main obligations are to appoint the Governor General of Canada (the Queen's representative) on the advice of the prime minister. The Queen also retains the non-delegated powers to authorise the appointment of up to eight extra senators, and to veto legislation passed less than two years ago.
The plural for the noun veto is vetoes.The plural possessive form is vetoes'.
(Tony Blair is no longer Prime Minister) No the Queen has no power over the elected government. She does have the power to appoint a Prime Minister, but in reality this is just a formality (because Parliament have to agree to it), and the Queen always appoints the leader of the ruling party. The Monarch used to have a veto, and even though they can still legally reject laws, this has not been done for about 300 years. If she did veto a law, the country would probably become a Republic in a matter of days.
Veto
The veto and the pocket veto are two ways that the _____ can reject a bill
by overriding the veto
veto
Sign it, veto it, do a pocket veto.