0
What else can I help you with?
How were the federalists' able to win ratification?
The federalists sent out the Federalists papers in which the people somewhat agreed with the constitution after some states disagreed with it.
What decision by the federalists help the cause of ratification?
they strongly disagreed about the national government
Compare the arguments for and against the Constitution made by the Federalists and Antifederalists during the struggle over ratification?
The main agreements between the antifederalist and the federalist were about the bill of rights and the need for a government. The antifederalist demanded to have a bill of rights because it can explain the ideals described in the Declaration of Independence better than the Constitution because the bill of rights gives us freedom of press, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion. Also, the federalist felt like it was important to have a government. They both disagreed. This is right luv
What were the issues upon which the Federalists and Anti Federalists disagreed?
The main issue that the federalists and anti-federalists disagreed upon was the Bill of Rights. The federalists believed that the people should just have the constitution, however the anti-federalists believed in making a bill of rights so the people could see what there rights were.
How did the federalist paper help to ensure the ratification of the constitution?
they strongly disagreed about the national government
During the struggle to ratify the constitution federalists and anti federalist disagreed mainly over the?
The division of power between the national government and the states.
What were the key issues in the debate between the federalists and anti federalists?
Whether a Bill of Rights was necessary to include in the Constitution.
Anti-federalists and federalists not have in common?
Anti-Federalists and Federalists both sought to shape the future of the United States but held opposing views on the balance of power between the federal and state governments. Both groups were concerned about the protection of individual rights and the structure of government, though they disagreed on the extent of federal authority. Additionally, both played crucial roles in the ratification debates of the U.S. Constitution, with Federalists advocating for a stronger central government and Anti-Federalists pushing for more power to remain with the states and the inclusion of a Bill of Rights. Ultimately, their debates laid the foundation for the political landscape of the nation.
What did federalists and anti-federalists disagree about?
The federalist and anti-federalist disagreed on the type of government that they wanted.
Why did federalists disagree with Thomas Jefferson?
they disagreed with thomas because federalist wanted to build a stronger more controlling government.....when thomas a democratic republican(nothing like republicans today.) wanted to keep the constitution in control and the freedom to the people.
What is one belief that two types of delegates shared?
Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists believed in the importance of protecting individual liberties and limiting the power of government. They disagreed on how to achieve this goal, with Federalists advocating for a strong central government and Anti-Federalists favoring more power for the states.
Why was the Bill of Rights added to the US Constitution?
In 1787, critics attacked the proposed Constitution of the United States because they felt that it did not protect the rights of the people. The Anti-Federalists felt that the delegates to the Constitutional Convention did not provide adequate safeguards to protect the citizens from government interference in their everyday lives. The Federalists, in order to get the Constitution ratified, agreed to add a Bill of Rights to the Constitution when the new congress met. The First Congress proposed 12 amendments for the Constitution. Ten were accepted by the states and became known as the Bill of Rights.Once the delegates at the Constitutional Convention agreed on the need to compose a Constitution, problems began to arise. Northern and Southern states disagreed about the nature and presence of slavery. Larger states with more population and smaller states with smaller populations disagreed about the nature of representation. The largest issue which caused the greatest amount of inertia concerned about the role of federal government in the life of its citizens. Federalists wanted a strong national government so that a sense of law and order and basic functionality can be present in the new nation. Arising out of the terrible reality of Shays' Rebellion as well as the high level of futility featured within the first Constitution called the Articles of Confederation, the Federalists, such as John Jay and Alexander Hamilton, were fairly pronounced on the issue of a strong federal governmental body. At the same time, the antifederalists, consisting of individuals like Patrick Henry and George Mason, felt that emboldening the federal government without some measure of individual freedom to act as a check against the authority would be a repeat of the tyranny featured with King George of Britain. The Bill of Rights was the compromise that pleased both sides. Federalists were happy because the federal government would retain its power to govern the nation effectively and properly. The Antifederalists were happy because the Bill of Rights became the first 10 amendments to the Constitution, and demanded that while federal government possessed power, it did not come at the cost of individual rights.
