After the affidavit, the next step in legal proceedings is typically a rebuttal affidavit. This allows the opposing party to address and dispute the claims made in the initial affidavit.
The court typically does not have a specific deadline to rebut an affidavit. The party opposing the affidavit may do so at any time before or during the court hearing where the affidavit is being considered. It is up to the judge's discretion to determine the relevance and credibility of the evidence presented in the affidavit.
I think all those this questions you have written in this page is not necessary to the person who need it immediately. wasting of time.
Do you mean an affidavit? It is a statement of something that you sign as to its truth.
An affidavit that states the heirs of a decedent. An Affidavit of Heirship is used instead of probate when a person dies without a will. http://www.heirship.com/2009/11/affidavit-of-heirship.html
No, definitely not. Except for extremely narrow and defined circumstances, affidavits are considered "hearsay" and are not admissable as 'best evidence." Best evidence would be the testimony. in person, of the individual who gave the affidavit. Such a personal appearance allows the opposing side to cross-examine the witness. You can't cross-examine a piece of paper.
sample of affidavit of acquittance
The lawyer produced a sworn affidavit in court today.
Some antonyms of the word affidavit is denial, veto, and negation.
An Affidavit is a sworn statement alleging that the facts contained within the body of the affidavit are true and correct upon penalty of perjury. The Affirmer then must raise his hand and swear to the truthfulness of the affidavit before a judge.
You can read a discussion about an Affidavit of Abandonment at the link below.
Your honor, this witness is contradicting his own sworn affidavit that was submitted to the grand jury!