Hate speech and speech likely to incite violence are not protected .
Yes it should be censored. Because most times it can o to the extreme without truth.
it's when times were hard,so probably sensational
money, and the speech, (these are the times that try men's souls)
Roosevelt's Four Freedoms speech resonated across generations due to its universal themes of freedom and human rights, addressing fundamental human aspirations. By articulating the ideals of freedom of speech, freedom of worship, freedom from want, and freedom from fear, he encapsulated values that remain pertinent in various social and political contexts. The speech also served as a rallying cry during times of crisis, emphasizing the importance of collective responsibility and resilience. Its enduring appeal lies in its call for a more just and equitable world, which continues to inspire movements for social change today.
Freedom of speech can be taken away in various contexts, such as during times of national emergency, under authoritarian regimes, or through laws that limit speech deemed harmful, such as hate speech or incitement to violence. Additionally, individuals may face censorship from private entities, like social media platforms, which enforce their own guidelines. In these cases, the balance between protecting public safety and preserving individual rights is often at the center of the debate. Ultimately, the specific circumstances and legal frameworks of a given society play a crucial role in determining when and how freedom of speech is restricted.
becuz it states to write whatever you believe has flaws in government. Example: if bush had an unfair law which he didn't Ny times could publish it because of the freedom of speech. The trail of John Peter zenger began this.
freedom from royal interference with the law freedom to petition the Monarch freedon from taxation by royal perogative freedom from the standing army during times of peace freedom for Protestants to bear arms freedom to elect members of parliament without royal intervention freedom of speech freedom to have a fair trial or not to be punished without trial freedom from unjust punishment incorporated in the Bill of Rights 1689, which apply in Britain today and in Commonwealth Countries
freedom from royal interference with the law freedom to petition the Monarch freedon from taxation by royal perogative freedom from the standing army during times of peace freedom for Protestants to bear arms freedom to elect members of parliament without royal intervention freedom of speech freedom to have a fair trial or not to be punished without trial freedom from unjust punishment incorporated in the Bill of Rights 1689, which apply in Britain today and in Commonwealth Countries
Many times when the freedom of speech is exercised, it is controversial. An example of this is flag burning. There has been a very intense debate over this for many years. Usually however, there is no controversy such as when you go to church or what ever your religion may be.
You should make eye contact with each individual, if only for a second. Also, your speech should not be too long (cut out unnecessary things) and keep it interesting, make them laugh a few times.
High Times Freedom Fighters was created in 1987.
While most of us agree with the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech, there are times when there might need to be some limitations; the Supreme Court has been asked to decide this question, as they consider a legal case involving an angry ex-husband who went on his Facebook page and wrote death threats towards his former wife.