Gerrymandering is not fair, unless you consider fair to mean 'fair game' in the sense that it is not illegal everywhere.
fair
There is no other better way to learn about gerrymandering is to join the political parties and become a campaigner. It is a means to try an obtain a political advantage by unfair measures.
The only people who consider the practice unfair is the political party that is adversely affected by gerrymandering. If the governor and the state legislature is in the control of either the Republican or Democrat party, then the minority is going to suffer politically since the party in power has the legal right to redraw the congressional districts to their advantage.
Politicians won't prevent gerrymandering, because that's what put them in office in the first place.
I think you mean Gerrymandering and the definition is here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerrymandering
Gerrymandering is done so that representatives can be guaranteed to be reelected. It benefits the representative of the district they are gerrymandering.
It rigs the vote. If a political party can set up an area that is the majority of that party then the votes cast will be for the candidates of that vote. This discounts the other party and puts them on an uneven playing field. In a democracy this is wrong.
The duration of Gerrymandering - film - is 1.35 hours.
It was unfair because they had no evidence that they were guilty.
Apparently, gerrymandering is quite legal in the State of Illinois.
Court-stacking, as well as gerrymandering, are similar to each other because in both instances they seek to gain an unfair advantage in some way. With court stacking, both sides of a case seek to stack a jury that will either be for or against a defendant's best interest. In these cases, based on race, ethnicity, or any other reason outside of evidence, and legal principle. Gerrymandering re-districts Congressional districts in a way that will be helpful to a particular political party.
It is unfair.