answersLogoWhite

0

The native resolution fo UXGA is 1600 x1200.

Ben

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is native resolution of UXGA?

1600x1200


What is the native resolution of UXGA?

1600 X 1200


What video standard has a typical resolution of 1600 x 1200?

UXGA


Will a 1024 X 768p resolution support High Definition?

Screen resolutions are usually just noted as [width] x [height] without the p. With the p it's usually used to show which standard is meant. Like 720p, 1080i or 1080p. That aside. The most known terms for HD is 'HD Ready' and 'Full HD'. The former being a resolution of 1028 x 720 and the latter being 1920 x 1080. So, if you mean if your screen has the right size, no. However all, with possibly a rare exception, media players can down scale it so you can still watch higher resolution video's. It just looks a tiny bit less good. Since it is hyped so much, try to find a screen with a sticker telling you it's either HD ready or Full HD. Any WXGA, SXGA, 2K, UXGA, WUXGA, WQXGA or QSXGA (all standards like HD and your XGA screen) screen has a resolution higher than 720p and will do fine.


What is different between SVGA monitor XGA monitor SXGA monitor and UXGA monitor?

The main difference is in the screen resolution (that is, the number of pixels on the screen). The more pixels you have, the more detail the monitor can display. Some standard formats and the number of pixels (width x height) are: VGA: 640 x 480 SVGA: 800 x 600 XGA: 1024 x 768 SXGA: 1280 x 1024 SXGA+: 1400 x 1050 UXGA: 1600 x 1200 QXGA: 2048 x 1536 Another minor difference is the "aspect ratio" which is the ratio of width to height of the screen. Most standard formats have an aspect ratio of 4 to 3, except for SXGA which has a ratio of 5 to 4. Wide screen formats are prefixed by a "W" and have an aspect ratio of 16 to 10 or 16 to 9. For example: WSXGA: 1440 x 900 WSXGA+: 1680 x 1050 WUXGA: 1920 x 1200


Why is better vga or analog rgb?

VGA IS analog RGB. The two are one and the same. There are some minor differences in the way the signals are handled: VGA uses two separate synchronisation lines, one for horizontal and one for vertical pulses. Broadcast signals tend to use a single sync line or even add the sync signals to the green signal. VGA and its derivatives, SVGA, XGA, SXGA etc may also be generated at a variety of frame and line frequencies rather than broadcast rates.Other than that, VGA uses 1V signals, terminated into 75 ohm loads at the end of the transmission line in exactly the same way as broadcast standard RGB signals.The quality of the image produced is dependent on the resolution in use as the picture is generated. VGA is the same resolution as standard definition television, SXGA is similar in resolution to HD images. UXGA is a higher resolution than HD.Analog RGB is normally carried on three or four separate coax cables. VGA is carried in a single cable and normally the individual conductors are smaller and less robust than separate cables. VGA signals will often be affected by long cable runs while separately cabled RGB signals typically can be carried far greater distances before the signal deteriorates noticeably.NOTE: for clarification, analog RGB is NOT the same as component signals. Although both use three lines, component is a different format to RGB and the two are not compatible.


What's the difference between a RGB cable and a VGA cable?

In terms of the pin connections, a VGA and an SVGA cable are identical. Normally, the different description is intended to show that the SVGA cable is higher quality than a VGA cable. There are no standards in place to define the difference so a manufacturer's description of a cable as SVGA means very little. All VGA signals (VGA, SVGA, XGA, WXGA, UXGA etc) carry the same red, green and blue image information, but as the resolution of the image increases, so does the data rate for each of the colors. High resolution carried for a long distance demands a better cable than lower resolutions over short distances. Therefore, low cost, low spec cables will probably work just fine over a 5 foot length, even with high resolution images. Using a poor quality cable will show problems such as double images, smeared images and in extreme cases, no image at all. It is hard to establish the quality of cable before you try it, so as a guide, look at the diameter of the cable. The fatter the cable, the better the quality tends to be. It's not a guaranteed way to tell but it's one of the few checks you can make before investing in cables.