answersLogoWhite

0

"Laws" are not derived from "case law" - DECISIONS are derived from case law.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What are laws based on common sense and judges previous decisions?

Common law and case law is derived from previous decisions. There is no law based simply on common sense.


What is Malaysian written law?

Malaysian Written laws are laws which have been enacted in the constitution or in legislations. Source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Malaysia The laws of Malaysia can be divided into two types of laws—written law and unwritten law. Written laws are laws which have been enacted in the constitution or in legislations. Unwritten laws are laws which are not contained in any statutes and can be found in case decisions. This is known as the common law or case law. In situations where there is no law governing a particular circumstance, Malaysian case law may apply. If there is no Malaysian case law, English case law can be applied. There are instances where Australian, Indian, and Singaporean cases are used as persuasive authorities.


What are the primary sources of US Laws?

The primary sources of US laws are English common laws, case law, statutes, and the Constitution. English common law was used as a foundation for the laws we have today, but in the 1800s it was ruled that these laws must be recorded so that the citizens would know what they were. Case laws stem from recorded cases and Statues are laws passes by congress. The constitution is above all laws and each law MUST be in accordance to the constitution.


How does newtons first law explain keplors first law?

Newton's first and third laws of motion don't contribute anything to an understandingof Kepler's laws of planetary motion.Kepler's laws can be derived from Newton's law of universal gravitation, along with hissecond law of motion.


Explain what the international definition of common law is?

Common Law is assumed law derived from long-held custom before actual laws were enacted.


What are The rules of law developed by judges called?

The rules of law developed by judges are called common law. Common law is derived from judicial decisions and precedent rather than statutes or regulations.


How does statutory law come into existence?

Because the laws are originally from bills that were approved into laws which is a act of statutory the laws are derived from statutory laws. (I law must first be approved before first passed as a law so it's origin is in the regulatory process which deals with statutory laws and veto's)


What are the main sources of law?

The primary source is man's innate ability to tell right from wrong. This is often coupled with religious teachings, but even without religion, there is a knowledge in all of us. Most of the rest of the laws are a result of the government action.


Are moral laws derived from the laws of the state?

Yes, moral laws in a society are generally derived from the laws of the state, because obeying the laws of the authority is usually deemed moral. However, law was initially derived from the moral principles of the primary faith or religion of an area. Thus we still have archaic codes such as cursing in front of women and children being unlawful in some places.


Do civil law judges to make law?

No, laws are enacted by a government/legislature. However if the laws are not worded clearly the judiciary can and do interpret them at trials and this becomes case law. Sometimes case law can appear significantly different to what was originally enacted.


What is common law in England?

"Common law" is where the laws are derived from the verdicts of other cases, ie, legal precedents that have been set before by other judges. That is opposed to laws passed by legislature or by special government bodies.


Explain written law in Malaysia?

Malaysia is nominally a constitutional monarchy as it has an elected king and federal separation powers between an independent executive, judicial and bicameral legislative branch. Reoccurring issues that have weakened Malaysian rule of law in practice center on endemic corruption, lack of transparency and equality questions for non-Muslims Malaysians.