0
It will obvioulsy be the contention of the defendant that no one had any "proof" that they did it, but if they were, nonetheless, found guilty the proseuction MUST have presented enough evidence to convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant committed the offense.
What else can I help you with?
What word has a definition of found not guilty?
The word "innocent" means the same as "not guilty". But nowhere apart from Scotland is anyone "found innocent". That is because in all common law systems, accused persons are presumed innocent unless proven to be guilty. If there is not enough proof that the person is guilty, he is found to be "not guilty" even though there is no proof of his innocence. The OJ Simpson case is a case in point. One court found that there was more evidence of his guilt than there was of his innocence, but another court found that there was not enough evidence of his guilt to find that he was proven guilty of the crime. He was therefore found not guilty although no court would find him innocent.
To convict a person of a crime a court must find the person guilty by?
A judge or jury must reach the decision that the defendant is guilty beyond a REASONABLE doubt. Not beyond ALL doubt - just "reasonable" doubt.
What is the standard of proof that the government must meet to find a defendant guilty in criminal law?
The standard of proof that the government must meet to find a defendant guilty in criminal law is "beyond a reasonable doubt." This means that the evidence presented must be strong enough to convince a reasonable person of the defendant's guilt without any reasonable doubt.
Should you plead not guilty to ticket for a wrong turn involving an accident in case there is a civil suit later?
Unless you have proof you are not guilty the judge will still find you guilty. Why not just take responsibility for your actions if you are guilty.
What is the difference between innocent and not guilty?
Innocent means you are innocent of a crime.. That is you did not commit it. A court (jury/judge) will not find someone "innocent". They can't say that you did not commit a crime, they can only decide for "not guilty" if the evidence presented is enough that you are believed to have committed a crime (guilty) or not (not guilty).
What does conviction's means?
The legal definition of convicted is one whom a court has officially determined is guilty of a criminal offense. That determination is made at the conclusion of a criminal prosecution or after the entry of a plea of guilty.
What is the highest burden of proof?
The burden of proof is on the prosecutor. They must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty. The defense only needs to raise reasonable doubt about the defendant's guilt. If jurors believe the defendant may have committed the crime, but have reasonable doubt then they must find the defendant not guilty.
When is a person found not guilty?
When the lawyer has the strongest evidence to prove that the person is not guilty. Added: When the prosecution fails to present their case clearly enough, or produce enough evidence, to convince the judge or (if it's a trial) a jury of the defendant's guilt.
Do appellate courts discover if you are innocent or guilty?
Any Court of Appeals can render a verdict on a case. However, the defendant can still appeal to the Supreme Court. However, the chances of the Supreme Court hearing the case are smaller.NOTE: Trials and courts never find defendants INNOCENT!! They can only find them Guilty or Not Guilty.Additional Answer:Appellate courts do not "discover if you are innocent or guilty." Determination of innocence or guilt is done only at the trial court level either by a jury or by the judge in a bench trial where the defendant has waived his right to a jury trial or where no jury trial is required. Appellate courts simply determine whether the trial court verdict of "guilty" was proper or not, and if so, it will affirm that finding. No appellate court can review a finding of "not guilty."
If found innocent in criminal court by guilty in family court can family court make criminal court arrest you?
No, family court cannot direct the criminal court to arrest someone. The two courts operate independently, and a finding of innocence in criminal court means that the individual is not guilty of the crime charged. However, family court can make decisions based on its own standards of evidence and may find someone guilty of violating family law, leading to different consequences, but it does not have the authority to enforce criminal penalties.
What were the circumstances surrounding Jesus' appearance before the Sanhedrin?
This was the like the church court. They wanted to find Jesus guilty
What level of proof is needed to find guilt in criminal court?
Proof beyond reasonable doubt. But, reasonable doubt is undefined. It's greater than simply most (called the preponderance) of the evidence but that's not good enough. Beyond most of the evidence reasonable doubt is undefined. I tend to think of it as about 95% of the evidence. So, if Sally says John did it and John says he didn't, John should be found not guilty. But, if the blood type of the John and the killer is one in 100 million John should be found guilty.
