Hammurabi's Code can be argued as just by emphasizing its emphasis on established laws that applied uniformly to all citizens, promoting a sense of order and accountability within society. The code's detailed provisions aimed to protect the weak and ensure fairness in legal proceedings, reflecting a societal commitment to justice. Furthermore, the public display of the laws allowed citizens to be aware of their rights and responsibilities, fostering transparency and adherence to the rule of law. This systematic approach to governance can be seen as a foundational step towards a more equitable society.
Historians found it to be just.
Historians found it to be just.
In fact it was the opposite. The codification of these rules were just.
After consolidating his gains under a central government at Babylon, he devoted his energies to protect his frontiers and fostering the internal prosperity of the empire ruling with a just law written in a 9 feet rock which contained 282 rules in the Hammurabi code.
The Hammurabi code has a prologue, 282 laws and conclusion. At the time of the code, laws were unforgiving. A little deed and found guilty was a dead person real fast. No possible reviewing of the case. I really think was the code was just and as a matter of fact, the Hammurabi was the first codified laws in history.
If you mean HTML website, just check the page source. If you mean a '.html' document, Right click and select Open With and select any text editor.
His name was Sin-muballit.
"Please do not argue with your brother," the mother said to one of her sons. A tendecy to argue is an annoying trait to have. When you argue, you are just wasting time.
Present tense plural is just the base form of the verb, no -s. argue. They (plural) argue all the time. She (singular) argues all the time.
You just need to open the document to edit.
just be silent..dont argue..
No just give them what they want