The genocide was chosen based on hate. It was a personal vendetta that was stemmed from no logical reason nor explanation but prejudice itself. Ultimately, no solutions were proposed.
um... Genocide?
Yes. otherwise you could be next...
Sadly, at one time in history or another, genocide has occured in nearly every nation of the world.
Rwanda and Namibia.
The editor invited various contributors to contribute to the upcoming issue of the magazine.
When contributions are given to interest groups they then can afford to promote their issue in the media and contribute to politicians. When interest groups contribute to a politician it raises the politician's awareness of their issue and it could theoretically influence the politician's opinion about the issue.
The Armenian Genocide refers to the systematic mass extermination and expulsion of 1.5 million Armenians by the Ottoman Empire during and after World War I, primarily between 1915 and 1923. It involved deportations, forced marches, and mass killings, as Armenians were targeted due to their ethnic identity and Christian faith. Despite extensive historical documentation, the genocide has been denied by the Turkish government and remains a contentious issue in international relations. Recognition of the genocide continues to be sought by many countries and organizations.
Smog. Asthma. Damage to plants. Ozone.
The attempts to try Ottoman war criminals after the Armenian Genocide were largely unsuccessful. In 1919, the Ottoman government initiated trials known as the "Independence Tribunals," which found some officials guilty, but many of the key perpetrators escaped justice. The trials were criticized for their lack of fairness and were ultimately seen as insufficient, leading to a sense of impunity among those responsible for the genocide. By the early 1920s, most of the accused had fled or were not held accountable, and the issue of justice for the Armenian Genocide remains contentious to this day.
Private company can increase number of directors who can contribute to share capital but cannot issue shares to public.
If the question is asking why the Pope mentioned the Armenian genocide at all, it is because it is the 100th anniversary of the start of the genocide. There were commemoration ceremonies in Armenia and around the world and the Pope was commiserating.If the question is asking why the Pope characterized the Armenian genocide as a genocide, it is because it is a genocide (as much as Turks whine and complain about how much they do not like that term). A genocide is a deliberate attempt to extinguish a group of distinct people. That is exactly what happened when whole towns of Armenians were forced out of their homes, marched for hundreds of kilometers, shot, and buried in mass graves as a consistent policy led by Young Turk leaders like Ismail Enver or Mehmed Talaat. The scholarship on this issue is quite clear. Those who argue against it have been proven to either, (1) be Turkish themselves, and therefore have a stake in Turkey being exonerated, or (2) have received publicly acknowledged funds from the government of the Republic of Turkey, which compromises their scholarship.
The states struggled to find out if Slavery was good or bad.