0
How did the Supreme Courts position on the rights of the accused in state courts change in the 1960s?
In the 1960s, the Supreme Court significantly expanded the rights of the accused in state courts through a series of landmark decisions. Notably, in Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Court ruled that states are required to provide counsel to defendants who cannot afford an attorney, thereby reinforcing the right to fair legal representation. Additionally, in Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court mandated that individuals in police custody be informed of their rights, including the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. These rulings reflected a broader commitment to ensuring due process and protecting individual rights within the criminal justice system.
What else can I help you with?
Can lower courts reverse or change US Supreme Court decisions?
No. Rulings of the US Supreme Court are 'the law of the land.'
Is it the congress or supreme cournt who make the county laws?
Congress, but the courts can change the law through rulings.
What does the judicial have over the congress?
The powers that Congress has over the Judicial Branch are:May impeach Supreme Court justices (for cause)May reject appointments to the Supreme CourtMay change the number of justices on the US Supreme CourtMay change the appellate jurisdiction of any court, including the US Supreme CourtMay establish or dismantle "inferior courts"May initiate constitutional amendments affecting the courts
What power does the congress have over the judicial power?
The powers that Congress has over the Judicial Branch are:May impeach Supreme Court justices (for cause)May reject appointments to the Supreme CourtMay change the number of justices on the US Supreme CourtMay change the appellate jurisdiction of any court, including the US Supreme CourtMay establish or dismantle "inferior courts"May initiate constitutional amendments affecting the courts
What did people accuse Young Franklin D Roosevelt of being?
FDR was accused of becoming a dictator after trying to change the Supreme Court for his advantage.
Why did the treatment of women change in the 12 century?
Those accused of crimes began to be tried by Royal Courts. No longer was their guilt or innocence proven through trial by ordeal or combat.
How did Franklin D. Roosevelt's court packing plan seek to change the makeup of the Supreme Courts?
by expanding the nine-member court with up to six more justices
Can the Judicial Branch be changed?
Yes, Congress has the authority to change the structure and function of the Judicial Branch in any way not prohibited by the Constitution. For example, Congress can change the number of justices seated on the Supreme Court; can create or abolish courts inferior to (below) the Supreme Court; and can change the what cases a court can hear under appellate jurisdiction.
Can a mother lose custody of her child by moving in with family members?
That by itself is not a reason courts would change custody.That by itself is not a reason courts would change custody.That by itself is not a reason courts would change custody.That by itself is not a reason courts would change custody.
Should the supreme courts have term limitation?
Yes, Too many "things" change in the course of a lifetime. If the courts body CAN NOT keep up with the trends then it is NOT following the law. The older a person gets the less tolerant they become. This in all fairness is NOT FAIR. KD
What are the Americans view about attitude toward change?
I think Americans are open to change and are very much receptive to it. They adopt with the change very well, the reason why they are now holds the position of supreme power among the nations of the world.
Why is the courts decision whether to hear a case is important?
Whenever the Supreme courts are deemed the only ones necessary to resolve some issue, it means the case in question is very controversial or difficult to handle. these cases usually result in drastic policy change for the entire nation; therefore, what cases they decide to look at potentially have heavy ramifications. also, the Supreme court is a singular court. they can only look at so many cases with all of the debating they do; if a case can be resolved in a lesser court, the supreme court would rather that be done.
