Take it with you. The judge will ask you questions and, if you need your evidence, show it to him then.
A traffic court handles traffic ticket cases. If a person has pleaded not guilty they appear in front a judge and plead their case. The judge takes into account the evidence of the police to and then make a decision.
A judge has final say on what is or is not admissable in their court. The only recourse if the evidence was refused is to file for an appeal and have the appeals court see if his/her refusal of the evidence was justified. If they find in favor of the judge, you're out of luck. If on the other hand the appeals court decides the evidence should be admissable, the case will most likely be retried with the new evidence presented.
Yes but you need to provide compelling evidence to the court. The judge will review the evidence and issue a ruling.Yes but you need to provide compelling evidence to the court. The judge will review the evidence and issue a ruling.Yes but you need to provide compelling evidence to the court. The judge will review the evidence and issue a ruling.Yes but you need to provide compelling evidence to the court. The judge will review the evidence and issue a ruling.
There should be a specific judge that you see in traffic court. The address of the court should be printed on the back of your ticket.
Have the judge order it
Judge and mocercy
it is presented to a judge or a judicL .
You would have to submit the argument in the form of a "motion" or 'petition' for the judge's consideration. But - why go through all that? Simply appear in court on the court date and give your argument in person.
Yes, there are rules regarding how evidence must be brought to the court and admitted as evidence. So if you don't follow the rules the judge doesn't have to allow it.You have asked a complicated question and not provided any details.Briefly, the rules of evidence apply to criminal and civil proceedings and the judge is the person who governs the trial. In some cases a litigant may want to present some "proof" of something to the court and it doesn't rise to the level of evidence. To be admissible, evidence must be both relevant and material. There must be a relationship between the evidence and the issues in the case. If the "evidence" presented is not relevant the judge may decide to exclude it. A judge has final say on what is or is not admissible in their court. You need to ask your attorney to explain why the evidence was rejected. The judge should have provided a ruling on its merits.If you still want to pursue the matter you can file for an appeal and have the appeals court see if the judge's refusal of the evidence was justified. If you think the judge has a conflict of interest resulting from any personal interest in the case then you need to approach the higher court to request a transfer to another judge.
You file a "Request for Trial or Hearing."
You call the clerk of the city court
You propose it. You draft an order saying what you would like for the court to order, and you submit it to the judge for consideration.