Definition_____A legal order for an inquiry to determine whether a person has been lawfully imprisoned.......Criticism also greeted president Lincoln's decision to suspend writs of habeas corpus.
Abraham Lincoln suspending habeas corpus is example of him using emergency powers during the Civil War. It was highly controversial and was challenged in court.
Habeas corpus stems from English common law. The very first instance of its use is therefore likely lost to antiquity. Perhaps it would be better to ask when it became an important principle of law. The eminent legal scholar William Blackstone, in his "Commentaries on the Laws of England," attributed the act which secured habeas corpus for the English people to King Charles II. Charles II ruled England from 1660 to 1685, so it would be fair to say that habeas corpus became a true principle of English law during that period.
The Patriot Act itself does not explicitly suspend habeas corpus; however, it expands the government's surveillance and detention powers in the context of national security. The U.S. Constitution allows for the suspension of habeas corpus during times of rebellion or invasion, but such a suspension must be enacted by Congress. In practice, the use of the Patriot Act has raised concerns about the potential for indefinite detention without due process, but any formal suspension of habeas corpus would require a legal and constitutional basis beyond the provisions of the Act.
suspended habeas corpus
I quote from the Constitution:"The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion, the public safety may require it."The Patriot Act, however, passed in 2001 provides for mandatory detention of terrorist suspects.
Definition_____A legal order for an inquiry to determine whether a person has been lawfully imprisoned.......Criticism also greeted president Lincoln's decision to suspend writs of habeas corpus.
Habeas corpus is a Latin term meaning "Have the body". It is a writ (court order) which directs the law enforcement officials who have custody of a prisoner to appear in court with the prisoner in order to determine the legality of the prisoner's confinement. A court order requiring that a confined person be brought to court so that his or her claims can be heard Habeas Corpus is an ancient common law prerogative writ - a legal procedure to which you have an undeniable right. It is an extraordinary remedy at law. Upon proper application, or even on naked knowledge alone, a court is empowered, and is duty bound, to issue the Extraordinary Writ of Habeas Corpus commanding one who is restraining liberty to forthwith produce before the court the person who is in custody and to show cause why the liberty of that person is being restrained. Absent a sufficient showing for a proper restraint of liberty, the court is duty bound to order the restraint eliminated and the person discharged. Habeas Corpus is fundamental to American and all other English common law derivative systems of jurisprudence. It is the ultimate lawful and peaceable remedy for adjudicating the providence of liberty's restraint. Since the history of Habeas Corpus is predominately English we must visit that history to gain understanding of American use of Habeas Corpus. It is the right to a trial in 20 days that is.
In a West Virginia Habeas Corpus proceeding, a Losh List is a list of the possible reasons a prisoner might be filing a habeas petition. The W. Va. Supreme Court of Appeals says if you don't use it, you lose it:"A prior omnibus habeas corpus hearing is res judicata as to all matters raised and as to all matters known or which with reasonable diligence could have been known; however, an applicant may still petition the court on the following grounds: ineffective assistance of counsel at the omnibus habeas corpus hearing; newly discovered evidence; or, a change in the law, favorable to the applicant, which may be applied retroactively." Syllabus Point 4, Losh v. McKenzie, 166 W.Va. 762, 277 S.E.2d 606 (1981).
On September 24, 1862, President Abraham Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus, an official court order demanding a prisoner be brought before the court in order to determine whether his (or her) incarceration is constitutionally valid. The writ of habeas corpus is considered a fundamental safeguard of liberty. Lincoln's suspension applied only to persons held as war captives or enlistment resisters during the US Civil War. The right of habeas corpus in civil court was superseded by trial before a military tribunal, similar to the treatment given Guantanamo detainees during the George W. Bush administration. Lincoln's order read (excerpt): "That the writ of habeas corpus is suspended in respect to all persons arrested, or who are now, or hereafter during the rebellion shall be, imprisoned in any fort, camp, arsenal, military prisons, or other place of confinement, by any military authority, or by the sentence of any court-martial or military commission." Historically, suspension of habeas corpus has been used in narrowly defined territories or with specific groups of people identified as threats, and has not been withheld from the population as a whole.
Habeas corpus is a Latin term meaning "Have the body". It is a writ (court order) which directs the law enforcement officials who have custody of a prisoner to appear in court with the prisoner in order to determine the legality of the prisoner's confinement. A court order requiring that a confined person be brought to court so that his or her claims can be heard Habeas Corpus is an ancient common law prerogative writ - a legal procedure to which you have an undeniable right. It is an extraordinary remedy at law. Upon proper application, or even on naked knowledge alone, a court is empowered, and is duty bound, to issue the Extraordinary Writ of Habeas Corpus commanding one who is restraining liberty to forthwith produce before the court the person who is in custody and to show cause why the liberty of that person is being restrained. Absent a sufficient showing for a proper restraint of liberty, the court is duty bound to order the restraint eliminated and the person discharged. Habeas Corpus is fundamental to American and all other English common law derivative systems of jurisprudence. It is the ultimate lawful and peaceable remedy for adjudicating the providence of liberty's restraint. Since the history of Habeas Corpus is predominately English we must visit that history to gain understanding of American use of Habeas Corpus. It is the right to a trial in 20 days that is.
It demonstrated that he would use almost any means to save the Union.Added: . . . . and subjugate the southern states who were attempting exercise their rights as expressed in the 9th and 10th Amendment of the US Constitution.