how the law consider that a person committed theft
no no
Detectives had believed that the maid had committed the theft.
Had committed
Are you kidding? That's what every defendant claims, "There is no proof that I committed the crime." Believe me, if you were arrested and indicted, SOMEONE has EVIDENCE of SOMETHING,Well if you were not arrested but the theft was reported and investigated but no proof was found to prosecute against you is what i think is this person is asking.... in that sense to my knowledge the answer would be no.
Being arrested for larceny free text means that one person committed a non-violent theft. Larceny is done one person to another person, but in that nonviolent way.
The past perfect tense of "commit" in the sentence would be "had committed" – the detectives believed that the maid had committed the theft.
Being arrested for larceny free text means that one person committed a non-violent theft. Larceny is done one person to another person, but in that nonviolent way.
committed
Yes, you can still be brought to court for theft if you committed the crime. The outcome of a civil lawsuit does not determine whether criminal charges can be pursued. If there is evidence of theft, the individual can file a criminal complaint against you.
well identity theft involves an innocent person whose identity was stolen by an unknown person.
It means three separate charges of theft committed at three different times.