You need a good lawyer and have to go back to court. Coercion is hard to prove. You have to try for the parental rights first but courts are not that keen on giving it back. They are scared you might do it again and they think about the child. Talk to a lawyer about your chances.
Yes signing over custody is not the same as giving up your parental rights. You still have the right to visitation for example.
A contract isn't legal in most jurisdictions when a party is coerced into signing it.A contract isn't legal in most jurisdictions when a party is coerced into signing it.A contract isn't legal in most jurisdictions when a party is coerced into signing it.A contract isn't legal in most jurisdictions when a party is coerced into signing it.
Not necessarily. The grandmother will have to either contact Child & Family Services and/or the court to be awarded legal custody of the child.
You should consult with an attorney who specializes in custody issues.You should consult with an attorney who specializes in custody issues.You should consult with an attorney who specializes in custody issues.You should consult with an attorney who specializes in custody issues.
Signing away one's parental rights or custody will not, in itself, relieve one of child support.
That completely depends on whether or not you voluntarily terminated your parental rights or the courts removed them before custody was re-assigned. If this happened, you have no rights. If it did not, you would need to refer to your court documents to see which rights, if any, were retained when you relinquished custody as this may be modified on a case-by-case basis.
It's not custody, it's guardianship, and there's no cost.
see link
Can you terminate parental rights if the absent parent is paying suport
Termination of parental rights does not, in itself, terminate child support.
In the state of California, a person goes to court to sign over their parental rights. Many people believe that by signing over their parental rights relinquishes them from having to pay child support, this is incorrect unless the child is adopted.
I think so especially if the employee can prove that he/she was coerced into signing. the fact they were rushed to sign is the fact that the employer know that they were in the wrong