The ideal resolution would be for you to consult with an attorney who can write some letters for you, draft an affidavit and make certain the correct documents are recorded. The lien holder should pay for the recording of any related documents. The following are some of the bases that should be covered:
If the contract affects the property then it is null and void and unenforceable if the owner didn't sign it.If the contract affects the property then it is null and void and unenforceable if the owner didn't sign it.If the contract affects the property then it is null and void and unenforceable if the owner didn't sign it.If the contract affects the property then it is null and void and unenforceable if the owner didn't sign it.
The answer is INJURY....
Yes, it is possible for someone to be on a lease for a property but not actually live there. This person may be a co-signer or guarantor on the lease, or they may have a legal or financial interest in the property without residing there.
Reversion refers to when a person has a future stake in some piece of property or estate. The person's rights are similar to that of a lender who cannot ask for the item back until the other person dies or gives it up. The property right "reverts" back to the lender at that time.
Yes, property tax is typically included in the debt-to-income ratio calculation as it is considered a recurring expense that affects a person's ability to repay debts.
The heir deed is property that is actually divided among the legal heirs of the late person, according to his will.
Kansas Statutes Annotated 21-3701 defines theft. One of the subsets of theft is possessing property known to have been stolen by another person. Whether the crime is misdie or felony depends on the value of the property. In Kansas, the person who actually stole the property is NOT chargeable with its possession--it has to have been stolen by one person and possessed by another.
The main difference between a property developer and a building contractor is the developer is the person who blueprints the area and buys the land to build on. The contractor is the person who actually builds the building or subcontracts the work out.
The judgment is against the person, not the property.
Property Management deals with running and maintaining business property for a firm or individual. Estate management deals with taking the estate of a deceased person through probate. They can be very similar and very different, but both require taking care of property.
In the UK you could not, the contract was/is between you and the person who hired you. You have to go after the property that belongs to this person not someone else (his dad is a separate legal entity and his dad did not hire you). I would think the US law was similar in this respect.
It basically means that for certain legal purposes, a corporation is similar to a person. For example, a corporation can own property, and have certain responsibilities.