0
What else can I help you with?
Who has the burden of proof in fraud civil claims?
While the Law is an extremely complicated subject, and only an attorney is competent to say for sure, in general it is the responsibility of the accuser, or Plaintiff, to prove that what he/she says is true.
The requirement to provide convincing edvidence that the defendant committed the act?
burden of proof
What changed in the practice of Law that shifted the burden of proof of insanity to the defendant?
the Federal Insanity Defense Reform Act
What does beyond reasonable doubt mean?
The clause beyond reasonable doubt simply means that there is enough evidence to convince the judge that you have committed the act or in other word, the crime.That is the standard which must be met for conviction of a defendant in a criminal trial. Notice that the standard is not, "beyond ALL doubt," - only beyond REASONABLE doubt.REASONABLE DOUBT - The level of certainty a juror must have to find a defendant guilty of a crime. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt, therefore, is proof of such a convincing character that you would be willing to rely and act upon it without hesitation in the most important of your own affairs. However, it does not mean beyond ALL doubt.See below link:
What’s ‘Prima Facie Evidence’?
Prima facie is a legal term used in civil cases where the plaintiff carries the burden of proof. It refers to a case where pre-trial evidence is reviewed by a judge and determined to be sufficient to warrant a trial. In civil litigation, a lawsuit is filed against the plaintiff claiming that the defendant’s actions or inactions caused an injury. The complaint must provide background information and the defendant’s contribution to the injury. The court must determine if the case is valid and merit full before proceeding. If the plaintiff fails to provide sufficient evidence, the court may dismiss the case before trial. If a prima facie case exists, the defendant must produce evidence to fight the claims made against them. In some cases, the evidence presented in a claim can allow for summary judgment. Once a prima facie case is established, the burden of proof shifts from the plaintiff to the defendant, who must prove that the claims against them are not valid enough for conviction. Where there in this act any act described under this act, or anywhere in this act there is requirement of register maintained by the company or the copies of the annual return. Where there is any act described under this act which requires the register or the copies of annual return, and the company fails to provide such register or copies of the annual return then the aggrieved party when take it to court. It will become a burden on the company to provide such register if the register asked by any shareholder, promoter or etc. for inspection. Hence, the register and copies of annual return will be count as prima facie evidence i.e. then such register and copies of annual return will be counted das the primary evidence as it clears the thing and gives clear picture of company’s practise follows the ethics or not.
What has the author S C Sarkar written?
S. C. Sarkar has written: 'mistake of fact in evidence act Commentary on Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Act no. 1 of 1872)' -- subject(s): Evidence (Law) 'mistake of fact in evidence act Commentary on Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Act no. 1 of 1872)' 'Commentary on Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Act no. 1 of 1872)'
What is meaning of loading?
of Load, The act of putting a load on or into., A load; cargo; burden.
What is the meaning of subvention?
The act of coming under., The act of relieving, as of a burden; support; aid; assistance; help., A government aid or bounty., To subventionize.
What is the mental act of believing or accepting something is true?
The mental act of believing or accepting something as true is called "faith" or "belief." It involves accepting something as true or real without requiring proof or evidence. Faith can be based on personal experiences, trust in others, or cultural teachings.
By how far is the definition of Evidence in the Indian Evidence Act complete?
The definition of "Evidence" in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, is in itself complete. The expression of the word in the Act is inclusive rather than conclusive. The Act in interpreting "Evidence" is relatively indicative of ascertainment of the magnitude of appreciation of the evidence. It is expressed in the Act as signification of the words uttered and things exhibited by witnesses before a Court of Justice. The definition of "Evidence" covers (a) the evidence of witnesses, and (b) documentary evidence. It does not cover everything that Court has before it. "Evidence" is adduced to prove or disprove any fact the truth of which is submitted to judicial investigation. Thus, mere inclusion of something as evidence without significance of its exhibition to establish logical inference of facts existence can be regarded as inconclusive interpretation of the expression.
What does it mean to incriminate someone?
To incriminate someone means to provide evidence or information that suggests their involvement in a crime or wrongful act. This can happen through witness statements, physical evidence, or other types of proof that implicate the person in question.
How does a yak like to do?
generally as little as possible, except to eat, reproduce and act a a beast of burden for man
