They jury plays no part in the presentation of the case. While seated in the courtroom hearing a trial the jury does not speak at all. After the defense and prosecution 'rest' their case, the jury adjourns to a private jury room where, in seclusion and outside the hearing of anyone else, the speak and debate among themselves as to the merits of the case. Then, they take a vote, either by by voice or secret ballot. When the jury reaches an accord on their verdict of guilt, or no guilt, on the part of the defendant, they deliver their verdict to the court. The judge re-convenes the court and with the jury present the verdict is read. The method of delivery of the verdict varies according to state custom and the court's procedural rules. If the attorney for either side wishes it, the judge may 'poll' the jury to determine from each juror if that is, in fact, their individual verdict. After this act, the trial is concluded and the jurors are dismissed from their service.
If you don't who will?
Yes, because people need to know what others think in their opinions
your own.
demonstration
yes maybe
what is right to express ideas and opinions
express opinions.
The First Amendment does this.
To express opinions or judgments in a dogmatic way.
Your opinions are your own, personal thoughts - nobody can write them for you!You need to learn how to express your thoughts and opinions effectively, which is why you were given this assignment. WikiAnswers will not write down your opinions for you.
The decision about an individual's insanity is typically made by a judge or a jury based on the evidence presented in court. While experts are not allowed to give ultimate opinions on insanity, they can provide their professional opinions on the relevant psychological or psychiatric factors surrounding the case to assist the decision-makers. Ultimately, it is up to the judge or jury to determine whether the legal criteria for insanity have been met.
Because esther forbes wanted to express her opinions of the revolution.