Popular sovereignty is most strongly expressed according to the constitution, Because it is the people's rights
if you must ask. :) XD
The current politician that does, would be Ron Paul.
Federalists
i dont now can u help me
anti-federalists
The Michigan senator who strongly supported the idea of popular sovereignty was Lewis Cass. He played a significant role in advocating for this principle, which allowed territories to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery. Cass's support for popular sovereignty was particularly influential during debates surrounding the Kansas-Nebraska Act in the mid-1850s. His approach aimed to address the contentious issue of slavery by letting settlers make their own decisions.
they strongly disagreed about the national government
Whether a bill of rights was necessary to include in the Constitution
Jainism seems to be most strongly concerned about breaking the power of bondage to the physical world. And as such they have code of conducts. This code of conduct is expressed in the twelve vows.
of course the Federalist did because the antifederlist didn't want the Constitution ratified at all and they strongly opposed the forming of the Constitution so you answer is FEDERALIST
Whether a bill of rights was necessary to include in the Constitution.
Absolutely. Marshall was a loyal federalist who strongly believed in the value of the Constitution. As Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, he helped ensure the Articles of the Constitution empowered the federal government.
Madison had helped develop Virginia's Constitution 11 years earlier, and it was his Virginia Plan that served as the basis for debate in the development of the U.S. Constitution. Madison argued strongly for a strong central government that would unify the country.