The term should be recited in the court order. If you still have questions then visit the court and ask the clerk.
When it is acquired during marriage, especially in a community property state. Separate property states allow certain property to remain separate and not subject to division in a divorce.When it is acquired during marriage, especially in a community property state. Separate property states allow certain property to remain separate and not subject to division in a divorce.When it is acquired during marriage, especially in a community property state. Separate property states allow certain property to remain separate and not subject to division in a divorce.When it is acquired during marriage, especially in a community property state. Separate property states allow certain property to remain separate and not subject to division in a divorce.
Generally: In a community property state, if the gift was from your parents and you don't co-mingle it with marital property by using marital funds to improve the home, it should remain separate property. However, you should consult an attorney in your area who specializes in property law. You may need to have your spouse execute some sort of waiver or release. In UK law: Yes, at the marriage vow you say "I share all that I have with you" and that applies.
You are entitled to their assets if you are married, because they are your assets as well. Certain things that require joint filing like bankruptcy cannot happen while they are in prison.
Florida being a separate property state means that assets acquired by one spouse during the marriage can remain the sole property of that spouse, rather than being considered joint marital property. In this system, each spouse retains ownership of their individual assets and debts unless they choose to share them. However, any property acquired during the marriage may be deemed marital property, subject to equitable distribution in the event of divorce. Prenuptial agreements can also help clarify property rights in Florida.
In Virginia, a borrower's husband who is not on the loan does not have to remain on the title. However, if the property is considered marital property, both spouses may have rights to it, and removing one spouse from the title could have legal implications. It's important for borrowers to consult with a real estate attorney to understand the potential consequences and ensure compliance with state laws.
This depends on the law of the jurisdiction in which the property is owned and in which the married couple live. This also depends on whether this has been the 'marital home', whether there are children, and many other factors. There is no hard and fast rule, except to say that if this affects you personally, you should seek legal advice. Many lawyers will offer initial advice on matrimonial affairs free for the first half-hour.Another PerspectiveYour spouse doesn't usually gain any ownership simply by marrying you. Property acquired before marriage in a community property state does not become community property. Property acquired before marriage in a separate property state can remain sole property.The situation can change if the property becomes a marital property with the spouse contributing to mortgage payments, improvements, etc., especially if the marriage is long term. In the case of a divorce, they may be compensated for their contribution in the division of marital property.If you have questions and want to protect your sole property then you should consult with an attorney in your jurisdiction for advice.
If the property is subject to by laws they remain subject to them even if the property is transferred to a new owner. The by laws would run with the land.If the property is subject to by laws they remain subject to them even if the property is transferred to a new owner. The by laws would run with the land.If the property is subject to by laws they remain subject to them even if the property is transferred to a new owner. The by laws would run with the land.If the property is subject to by laws they remain subject to them even if the property is transferred to a new owner. The by laws would run with the land.
Yes. If the judgment resulted in a lien against property. Even though the judgment will be discharged in the BK. The lien will remain on the property and the item will remain on the CR. Due to the negative effect of a BK, the additional notice of a judgment, is rather insignificant.
property always remain to common people. all maharaja always rule they are the administrator but the property always remain to common people.
That depends on where the property in the trust is located and the state laws under which the trust was drafted. For example, A trust drafted in California would also need to meet the requirements of Massachusetts trust law if it held real property located in Massachusetts. The trust would need to meet those requirements (of Massachusetts) in order for the deed out from the trust to be valid. Trusts that are acceptable in some states are not acceptable in others. There are many instances where trusts from other states have been used to hold title to Massachusetts property. If the trust doesn't meet Massachusetts trust requirements the trust fails, the trustee may hold the property as an individual or the property may remain in the estate of the "trustor". In cases where the trust fails and the "trustor" died, the estate must be probated. Trusts are not to be taken lightly. An improperly drafted trust can reate a costly legal quagmire.
five million thousand days XD
Yes, you can be charged with trespassing on public property if you enter or remain on the property without permission or lawful authority.