The time it takes for a judge to make a decision after a case has been disposed can vary widely depending on the complexity of the case, the court's schedule, and the specific legal issues involved. In some instances, judges may issue a ruling within a few days or weeks, while in more complicated cases, it could take several months. Additionally, judges often have a backlog of cases that can also affect the timing of their decisions. Ultimately, there is no set timeline, and it can differ significantly from one case to another.
How long does it take for the courts to decide on a judicial release?
Yes, as long as it contains his signature. The court file of the case and all the transcripts will contain PLENTY of references to the presding judge.
The length of time for which a judge can revoke bail varies depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. In some cases, a judge may immediately revoke bail upon a violation, while in others, a hearing may be required. Ultimately, it is at the judge's discretion to determine the appropriate length of time for revoking bail.
If you are paying then, you can fire them as long as the Judge agrees.
That will be determined by the judge on the basis of the severity of the case.
In a 38.50 appeal, which typically refers to a motion for post-conviction relief in some jurisdictions, the timeframe for a judge to make a decision can vary widely depending on the specific court and the complexity of the case. Generally, judges aim to issue decisions in a timely manner, but it can take several months or longer. It's important to consult local court rules or an attorney for precise timelines applicable to a specific case.
how was trash disposed 1000 years ago
No they will. Not
Yes, if he or she feels it is necessary and appropiate or maybe wishes to clarify or specify something. Of course, as long as he or she is well-informed about and/or is related to the case.
Normally the parties, not the court, files the judgment. There is no time requirement for the judge to RENDER a decision.
The main reason behind the decision in the Plessy v. Ferguson case was the upheld legality of racial segregation under the "separate but equal" doctrine. The Supreme Court ruled that as long as facilities and opportunities provided to African Americans were theoretically equal to those provided to whites, segregation was constitutional. This decision had significant implications for promoting racial discrimination and the perpetuation of Jim Crow laws in the United States.
It is totally dependent upon the case load of the presiding judge.