Unfortunately there is no hard and fast rule about this; the law mentions the "amount and subtantiality of the portion," and neither the courts nor the legislation have seen fit to clarify that. Fair use, at the moment, is being judged on whether the excerpt is "appropriate in kind and amount," and whether the use is transformative.
Apex question, copyright violation All of the above
ABBA's music is protected under international copyright laws.
I would have to say no. The DSi's microphone distorts the sound so much, and the recording only allows for like, a minute of recording time. Still, I would put credits at the end. Hope I answered it for ya. Byee
Accidentals go in front of the notes.
The bass clef notes that are considered low on the musical staff are F, G, A, and B.
One needs to combine at least three notes simultaneously for their note to be defined as a chord. Combining three notes to make a chord is considered a triad. More notes can be added to produce more complex chords.
ABBA's music is protected under international copyright laws and would be illegal to reproduce it here for free.
Published originally as a serial in 1849 and as a complete novel in 1850, the book is in the public domain. Various later editions may have copyright protections for new material, such as introductions and notes.
Considered to be promissory notes in which the applicant/borrower is entitled to payments.
You would need to purchase the sheet music; the notes themselves are not helpful. While Symphony No. 5 is not under copyright, many of the arrangements of it for various instruments are.
If you mean as admissable evidence in a trial, then they might be if it can be proven that they came from an original. Whether or not any questionable evidentiary material can be submitted is always decided by the presiding judge.
If the text is taken entirely from the textbook, yes. If the notes are entirely your own work, it is your exclusive right to decide whether to distribute them or not.