There is no minimum, and there is no maximum. The prosecution could call no witnesses or a hundred witnesses. A conviction of murder is based on the totality of the facts surrounding the person's guilt, not the number of witnesses called to testify.
Min Chen - murder convict - was born in 1983.
Becuase, if I am correct, it must take all of the jury to convict someone of murder; unanimous means all.
It depends on the proof and witnesses of murder.
To suffer from a mental or emotional shock or upset due to an upsetting experience. So someone who witnesses a mass murder could be traumatized from what they witnessed.
with no evidence against you any half-way decent lawyer would probably get you proven not guilty.
Texas: 3 days; convict on Friday, execute on Monday.
its about a boy that witnesses a murder and the murderer chases him
Pip's convict was running away but then he heard that the other convict had gotten away as well. He then turned back just to make sure the other convict was captured. This was most likely done because the two convicts had some history between the two of them
If you mean in the United States, there's an awful lot they CAN do to push you into testifying in a case like that -- assuming you mean that you're being subpoenaed by the District Attorney's Office to testify for the Prosecution. However, if you are being put under pressure to testify FOR the defendant as a witness for the Defense, you will have a far greater chance of refusing to testify.
John Dillmann has written: 'The French Quarter killers' -- subject(s): Witnesses, Protection, Murder, Case studies 'The French Quarter killers' -- subject(s): Case studies, Murder, Protection, Witnesses 'Blood warning' -- subject(s): Homicide investigation, Murder, Case studies
depends on how strong the statements impact is. But usually no
No, murder means you killed someone. Attempted murder means you tried to kill someone. You could still go to jail, though.