This is a huge branch of law, and limits will be as varied as the possible applications of the law. If you steal the image of Mickey Mouse and make a fortune illegally using and selling it, the amount that Disney will sue you for is going to be huge, as you can imagine. [There is some interesting debate around Disney's right to hold on to Mickey Mouse; some say that he should have been released to the public domain by now...] If your cousin gave one pirated copy of a popular movie to a friend, without money changing hands, that is still illegal activity, but it is not likely that your cousin will have to sell the farm to cover the suit if he is caught and convicted. Basically, the owner will want to recover whatever he would have made from the illegal use of the property, and perhaps there are sometimes other damages that he will want to recover. For example, the thief may in some way damage the reputation that has built up around the property. Money money money...
One reason that these laws exist is because the owner of a piece of intellectual property has a right to profit from that property as long as the person owns it. Every time it is illegally given to people in the market for that particular property, then the lawful owner's market has been reduced.
In the US, statutory fines range from $750 to $30,000 per infringement, but unless the infringement has the potential for long-term damages to your work or image (say, your photograph becomes associated with a political campaign you do not support), you're probably best off attempting to settle out of court for real damages. So, for example, if someone uploaded your song and it was downloaded 10,000 times, you would start by sending a Cease and Desist notice asking that they take down the mp3 and repay you for lost mechanical licenses, which in that case would amount to $910.
We've learned from Righthaven cases over the past year or so that suing people for copyright infringement is not a viable business model.
The correct answer is copyright violations.
Yes, individuals can sue for violations of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) if they believe their rights to privacy regarding their educational records have been violated.
Yes, individuals can sue a state for constitutional violations under certain circumstances. This can be done through a legal process known as a lawsuit or a civil rights action.
Yes, individuals can sue a business for damages or legal violations through civil litigation in court. This allows them to seek compensation for harm caused by the business's actions or seek legal remedies for violations of laws or regulations.
Yes, individuals can sue a state for damages or legal violations through a process known as sovereign immunity waiver, where the state consents to be sued in specific circumstances.
a person can sue for the rights of the copy right back and if the person made money off the copyright sue for the money that has been obtained
These are actually illegally uploaded, and are violations of copyright.
Yes, an individual can sue a state for damages or legal violations through a process known as sovereign immunity waiver, where the state consents to being sued in certain circumstances.
Under US laws, all copyright claims under federal copyright must be made in US district court. You would sue for a declaratory judgment that the work did not meet the federal criteria for an enforceable copyright, once you have standing to sue (i.e., someone has threatened to sue you for copyright infringement of an invalid copyright).
Yes, individuals can sue the state for damages or legal violations through a process known as sovereign immunity waiver. This allows individuals to hold the state accountable for wrongdoing in certain circumstances.
His estate is managed by John Branca.
Sue Friddle has written: 'Anyone'$ songwriting guide to copyright protection and song-pitching by mail' -- subject(s): Copyright, Music, Popular music, Writing and publishing