Not much really, based on the additional information you provided, I recommend taking the proactive approach, file a criminal complaint against your roommate for extortion, and begin eviction proceedings.
Since your husband is not engaging in criminal behavior as you stated, the burden of evidence is on his accuser. Let him file his own report, them file a second complaint for filing a false report. If there is no fact in a blackmailer's claims, there is nothing to fear.
You need one piece of (true and verifiable) evidence. Infidelity does not depend on a sliding scale. Suspicions do not count as far as the law is concerned. If you cannot prove it, then it is not a fact, it is an opinion.
You need evidence to prove any charge.
you can counter sue for anything. In Civil court, you don't need proof beyond a reasonable doubt, just a perponderance of the evidence. Pretty much, just prove you're right, if the Judge, or in your case a trial by a jury of your peers would be best, believe you they will move in your favor.
No. Evidence is only presented if the prosecutor and defender need to argue the case. The evidence is only used to prove guilt or innocence.
You cant prove anything if you first think you need to SEE TO BELIEVE You need to BELIEVE TO SEE that's how you get evidence I have tried it have seen the Glory of Jesus Christ
You may need to supply evidence if called upon to prove your opinion.
In a defamation case, you need to provide evidence that the statement made about you was false, that it was communicated to a third party, and that it caused harm to your reputation. Additionally, if the statement is about a public figure, you may need to prove that it was made with actual malice or reckless disregard for the truth.
As much as they need to prove a theory.
Circumstantial evidence is evidence that implies a fact but does not directly prove it. It requires inference or deduction to connect it to a conclusion. In contrast, direct evidence directly proves a fact without the need for inference.
To prove something you need proof, and proof is defined as ,"any factual evidence that helps to establish the truth of something", and evidence is an actual visual thing, and if you have NOTHING that is visual of and actual object, you cannot prove it, so no.
Direct evidence is something that can prove a fact, evidence that someone has seen or heard. Indirect evidence is different because it relates to facts and does not prove a fact on its own. Indirect evidence is also called circumstantial evidence.
No because you need more information to provide a clear evacuation.